Botha v Gauteng Department of Education and Another (JR719/14) [2018] ZALCJHB 179 (11 May 2018)

Botha v Gauteng Department of Education and Another (JR719/14) [2018] ZALCJHB 179 (11 May 2018)

The court found that none of the grounds of appeal raised by the applicant demonstrated a reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion. The application for leave to appeal was therefore refused, and no order as to costs was made.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] ZALCJHB 179
Parties
Applicant: Cathrina Baby Botha; Respondent: Gauteng Department of Education; Respondent: Prinshof School
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 May 2018
Case Number
JR719/14
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Decision
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused.
Judges
B Whitcher
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success, Costs Order
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Prospects of Success Costs Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cathrina Baby Botha

Applicant

Gauteng Department of Education

Respondent

Prinshof School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion on the grounds of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that none of the grounds of appeal raised by the applicant demonstrated a reasonable prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion. The application for leave to appeal was therefore refused, and no order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is denied.
  • There is no order as to costs.