BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd) and Diageo South Africa v Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd And Amstel Licence (17/LM/Feb08) [2008] ZACT 33 (14 May 2008)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in the South African beer market. The merging parties' combined post-merger market share would be 9.9%, which is significantly lower than SABMiller's approximate 90% market share. The transaction...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] ZACT 33
- Parties
- Applicant: BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd); Applicant: Diageo South Africa; Respondent: Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Amstel Licence
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- 17/LM/Feb08
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Clearance / Merger Approval
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Y Carrim, U Bhoola, M Mokuena
- Legal Topics
- Merger Clearance, Market Share Analysis, Joint Venture Restructuring, Public Interest, Beer Distribution, Dominance Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd)
Applicant
Diageo South Africa
Applicant
Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Amstel Licence
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Clearance / Merger Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed restructuring of the joint venture and profit-sharing arrangement will substantially lessen or prevent competition in the South African beer market.
- 2 Whether the merger raises any public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in the South African beer market. The merging parties' combined post-merger market share would be 9.9%, which is significantly lower than SABMiller's approximate 90% market share. The transaction would create a more competitive entity capable of challenging SABMiller, particularly in distribution. No public interest concerns were identified. The merger was therefore approved unconditionally.
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd) and Diageo South Africa and Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd and Amstel Licence is approved unconditionally.
- No conditions are imposed on the approval.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
53 paragraphs
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 17/LM/Feb08
In the matter between
BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd)
and Diageo South Africa Primary Acquiring Firms
And
Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd
And Amstel Licence Primary Target Firms
Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member); U Bhoola (Tribunal Member) and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 09 April 2008
Decided on : 09 April 2008
Reasons Issued : 14 May 2008
Reasons
Approval
[1] On 09 April 2008 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the merger between BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd) and Diageo South Africa and Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd and Amstel Licence unconditionally. The reasons appear below.
Parties
[2] The primary acquiring firm is BrandCo, Currently Heineken (Pty) (Ltd) (âBrandCoâ) and Diageo South Africa (Pty) Ltd (âSpiritsCoâ).1 BrandCo is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Heineken International B.V. (âHeinekenâ).2 BrandCo is a special purpose vehicle utilised specifically for this transaction.
[3] The target firm is Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd (âBrandhouseâ) and the Amstel Licence. Brandhouse is jointly controlled by Heineken International B.V. (âHeinekenâ); SpiritsCo and Namibia Breweries Ltd (âNBLâ).3
Transaction
[4] The parties to the proposed transaction have decided to restructure their existing cost sharing joint venture relationship and establish a new profit sharing arrangement.4 In terms of the proposed transaction, Diageo Highlands and NBL will each acquire shares in BrandCo from Heineken with the resultant shareholding in BrandCo being as follows: Diageo Highlands 42.25%; Heineken 42.25% and NBL 15.5%. BrandCo will then acquire half of the share currently held by NBL in Brandhouse and the remaining half of the share in Brandhouse will be acquired by SpiritsCo. On completion of the transaction the shareholding in Brandhouse will be BrandCo and SpiritsCo, each having a 50% shareholding in Brandhouse. The structure post transaction can be depicted as follows:
NBL Diageo Highlands Heineken
15.5% 42.5% 42.5%
75%in supplyco
25% in Supplyco
Spiritsco
50% 50%
Brandhouse
Source: Merging Parties
Parties Activities
[5] BrandCo is a special purpose vehicle to be utilised for the purposes of this transaction and as such it has no activities. The Heineken Group is active on a world wide basis in the brewing, commercialisation and distribution of beer. The main Heineken brands which are sold on a world wide basis are Heineken and Amstel. The Diageo group brews, markets and distributes beer on a world wide basis. The Diageo group beer brands sold in South Africa include Guinness Extra Stout (bottled), Guinness draught (cans and kegs) and Killarney Irish ale (cans and kegs). In addition to beer products, the ready to drink spirit based products (âRTD productsâ) which Diageo sells in South Africa include Smirnoff Spin, Smirnoff Storm, Smirnoff Twist and Archers Aqua. The Diageo brand which is sold in South Africa is Foundry.
[6] Brandhouse is a cost sharing joint venture established for the purpose of consolidating the sales, marketing and distribution functions of the parent companies, being Heineken, Diageo and NBL. Brandhouse currently markets, sells and distributes beer and Scotch whisky in South Africa.6 The joint venture was established in 2003.
Rationale of transaction
[7] The parties submit that in order to build on the commercial success of Brandhouse, their joint venture company, they have decided to restructure their arrangements in advance of the expiry of the initial term.7 Additionally, in order to incentivise each partyâs commitment to the existing cost sharing arrangement, the parties have decided to enter into the Brandco joint venture under which each party will share in the profits of the combined sales of all the partiesâ beer, cider and RTD brands in South Africa. The parties submit that the transaction will also result in various synergies for them including incremental sales volumes from investing in the route to market, long term distribution savings and enhanced brand quality and a deeper penetration of the market.
Competition Analysis
[8] The Commission found that there is an overlap in the activities of the merging firms in respect of the supply of beer in South Africa. In line with the European Commission decision in Heineken and Bayerische Brau Holdings/JV the Commission defines the market as the market for the supply of beer. The Commissionâs investigation revealed that the effect of combining the merging firmsâ beer operations in South Africa is that they will have 9.9% post-merger market share. This 9.9% market share would be made up of 7.5% of Heineken, 1% of Diageo plc and 1.4% market share of NBL. The Commission is of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to raise any competition concerns, as the market is dominated by SABMiller with approximately 90% of the market. Furthermore the Commission submits that the proposed transaction is likely to create a firm whose ability to compete with SABMiller will be enhanced, particularly in the area of distribution of beer. We agree with the Commissionâs conclusion that the merger is pro competitive.
Public interest
[9] There are no public interest issues.
Conclusion
[10] Based on the above the transaction will not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in the identified markets and is accordingly approved unconditionally.
_________________ 14 May 2008
Y Carrim Date
U Bhoola and M Mokuena Concurring
Tribunal Researcher : J Ngobeni
For the Merging Parties : Webber Wentzel Bowens
For the Commission : Makgale Mohlala
1 SpiritsCo does not control any firm. SpiritsCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of Diageo Great Britain Ltd (âDiageo GBâ). Diageo GB is a wholly owned subsidiary of Grand Metropolitan Public Limited Company, which is in turn a wholly owned subsidiary of Diageo Holdings Ltd. Diageo Holdings Ltd is wholly owned subsidiary of Diageo Plc. Diageo Plc controls Highlands Holding B.V. (âDiageo Highlandsâ)
2 BrandCo do not control any firm. Heineken is a wholly owned subsidiary of Heineken N.V. which is in turn controlled by Heineken Holding N.V. (âHeineken Holdingâ). Heineken Holding is ultimately controlled by LâArche Holding SA (âL Archeâ), a Swiss holding wholly owned by the Heineken family
3 Heineken, Diageo SA and NBL each hold 33.33% shares in Brandhouse. NBL is controlled by NBL Investment Holding Ltd (âNBLIHâ). NBLIH is jointly controlled by O&L Beverages (Pty) Ltd (âO&L Beveragesâ) and Diageo Heineken Namibia B.V (âDiageo Heineken Namibiaâ). O&L Beverages is controlled by Ohlthaver & List Finance and Training Corporation Ltd (âOlfitraâ). Diageo Heineken Namibia is jointly controlled by Heineken and Diageo Highlands.
4 In 2004 Diageo plc, Heineken International B.V and Namibia Breweries Ltd established a joint venture company in South Africa called Brandhouse Beverages (Pty) Ltd. Each parent company holds one third of the issued share capital of Brandhouse and therefore jointly controls Brandhouse. The objective of Brandhouse was to operate as a cost sharing joint venture, for the purpose of consolidating the marketing, sales, physical distribution and other administrative functions of certain brands of the parent companies in South Africa.
5 Supplyco to design, build and operate a brewery in South Africa for supply of certain Brandco brands to Brandhouse.
6 The Beer includes Windhoek, Heineken, Guinness and Kilkenny. The Scotch whisky includes Johnnie Walker, Bells, and J&B, White Horse and Dimple as well as a broad selection of single malt whiskies. Brandhouse also markets, sells and distributes other products in South Africa such as Smirnoff Vodka, Jose Cuervo Tequila, Tanqueray Gin, Captain Morgan Black Label, Spiced Gold Rum, Foundry Cider as well as RTDs including Smirnoff Spin, Smirnoff Storm, Smirnoff Twist and Archers Aqua.
7 The initial term of the existing cost-sharing Brandhouse joint venture arrangement expire in July 2009.
4