Bridges v Van Jaarsveld (3662/2006) [2008] ZAGPHC 342 (11 November 2008)

Bridges v Van Jaarsveld (3662/2006) [2008] ZAGPHC 342 (11 November 2008)

The court found that the defendant unilaterally repudiated the engagement agreement to marry, which constituted a wrongful breach of contract. The defendant's reasons for termination were refuted by the plaintiff's evidence, which was corroborated by witnesses and unchallenged due to the defendant's failure to testify. The breach was also found to be injurious and contumelious, given the manner of termination and subsequent media publicity. The plaintiff proved her entitlement to contractual damages for wasted wedding expenses, removal and storage costs, loss of income, and improvements to the intended marital home, subject to reasonable deductions. Delictual damages were awarded for...

Citation
[2008] ZAGPHC 342
Parties
Plaintiff: Sunette Bridges; Defendant: Deon Van Jaarsveld
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 November 2008
Case Number
3662/2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Judges
Raulinga
Legal Topics
Breach of Promise to Marry, Contractual Damages, Delictual Damages, Contumelious Conduct, Quantification of Damages
Family and Children Delict Breach of Promise to Marry Contractual Damages Delictual Damages Contumelious Conduct Quantification of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sunette Bridges

Plaintiff

Deon Van Jaarsveld

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant unilaterally repudiated the engagement agreement to marry.
  2. 2 Whether the unilateral repudiation was wrongful and constituted a breach of contract.
  3. 3 Whether the termination of the engagement was injurious or contumelious, giving rise to delictual damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant unilaterally repudiated the engagement agreement to marry, which constituted a wrongful breach of contract. The defendant's reasons for termination were refuted by the plaintiff's evidence, which was corroborated by witnesses and unchallenged due to the defendant's failure to testify. The breach was also found to be injurious and contumelious, given the manner of termination and subsequent media publicity. The plaintiff proved her entitlement to contractual damages for wasted wedding expenses, removal and storage costs, loss of income, and improvements to the intended marital home, subject to reasonable deductions. Delictual damages were awarded for...

Court Disposition

Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff.

Orders

  • Defendant is ordered to pay the amount of R282 413-00 to plaintiff.
  • Defendant is ordered to pay interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum on the aforesaid amount from 13 February 2006 to date of payment.