Buffalo Club v Border Cricket and Others (1078/2011) [2012] ZAECGHC 20 (26 April 2012)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to use certain facilities at Buffalo Park Cricket Stadium under the written agreement with the first respondent. The agreement, while not a model of clarity, indicated that the applicant was entitled to use the rugby playing fields, floodlights, and change rooms during specified periods. The dispute as to the precise extent of usage and whether there was a breach of the agreement was not for determination at this stage, but for the action to be instituted. The applicant demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of harm, including financial loss and loss of membership, if interim relief was not granted. The balance of...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAECGHC 20
- Parties
- Applicant: Buffalo Club; Respondent: Border Cricket (an association incorporated under section 21 of the Companies Act 61 of 1973); Respondent: Cricket South Africa; Respondent: Buffalo City Municipality
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2012
- Case Number
- 1078/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Application
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted in favour of the applicant; first respondent ordered to allow access and use of facilities pending finalisation of action; costs awarded against first respondent, excluding costs of previous proceedings.
- Judges
- N G Beshe
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Lease Agreement, Specific Performance, Urgent Application, Access to Sports Facilities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Buffalo Club
Applicant
Border Cricket (an association incorporated under section 21 of the Companies Act 61 of 1973)
Respondent
Cricket South Africa
Respondent
Buffalo City Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim access and use of the rugby playing fields and facilities at Buffalo Park Cricket Stadium pending finalisation of an action.
- 2 Whether the written agreement between the applicant and first respondent remains valid and enforceable.
- 3 Whether the requirements for an interim interdict have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to use certain facilities at Buffalo Park Cricket Stadium under the written agreement with the first respondent. The agreement, while not a model of clarity, indicated that the applicant was entitled to use the rugby playing fields, floodlights, and change rooms during specified periods. The dispute as to the precise extent of usage and whether there was a breach of the agreement was not for determination at this stage, but for the action to be instituted. The applicant demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of harm, including financial loss and loss of membership, if interim relief was not granted. The balance of...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted in favour of the applicant; first respondent ordered to allow access and use of facilities pending finalisation of action; costs awarded against first respondent, excluding costs of previous proceedings.
Orders
- The forms and service provided for in the Rules are abridged and the application is heard as one of urgency.
- The first respondent is ordered to allow the applicant and its members access to and use and enjoyment of the rugby playing fields, grassed surface, and rugby playing field at Buffalo Park Cricket Stadium, East London, and to utilize the floodlights and change room facilities for the period between 1 April and 30...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment