Building Allied and construction Union and Others v B & E Quarries (Pty) Ltd and Another (P173/97) [1998] ZALC 124 (3 December 1998)
The court held that, although the Labour Relations Act does not prescribe a specific time period for filing a statement of case, the Act's objective of expeditious dispute resolution requires claims to be instituted within a reasonable time. The applicants' delay of 11 months was objectively unreasonable, and an application for condonation was required. The applicants had not lodged such an application but requested a postponement to do so. The court found that the prejudice to the respondents could be addressed by a costs order and granted the applicants the indulgence to apply for condonation within two weeks, ordering them to pay the respondents' costs for the day on an attorney and...
- Citation
- [1998] ZALC 124
- Parties
- Applicant: Building Construction and Allied Workers Union; Applicant: Peli and 61 Others; Respondent: B & E Quarries (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Port St Francis (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 December 1998
- Case Number
- P173/97
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Court Application / Point in Limine Regarding Condonation for Late Filing of Statement of Case
- Outcome
- Application postponed to allow applicants to file condonation application; costs awarded against applicants for the day.
- Judges
- Basson
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Unfair Dismissal, Late Filing, Prejudice, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Building Construction and Allied Workers Union
Applicant
Peli and 61 Others
Applicant
B & E Quarries (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Port St Francis (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Court Application / Point in Limine Regarding Condonation for Late Filing of Statement of Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' delay of 11 months in filing the statement of case was unreasonable.
- 2 Whether condonation for late filing is required under the Labour Relations Act.
- 3 Whether the applicants should be granted a postponement to apply for condonation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, although the Labour Relations Act does not prescribe a specific time period for filing a statement of case, the Act's objective of expeditious dispute resolution requires claims to be instituted within a reasonable time. The applicants' delay of 11 months was objectively unreasonable, and an application for condonation was required. The applicants had not lodged such an application but requested a postponement to do so. The court found that the prejudice to the respondents could be addressed by a costs order and granted the applicants the indulgence to apply for condonation within two weeks, ordering them to pay the respondents' costs for the day on an attorney and...
Court Disposition
Application postponed to allow applicants to file condonation application; costs awarded against applicants for the day.
Orders
- The matter is postponed to allow the applicants to bring a proper application for condonation within two weeks of the judgment date.
- The applicants are to pay the respondents' costs for today on the attorney and own client scale, the one paying the other to be absolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment