Burger and Others v Schrader and Others (LANC01R/2025) [2025] ZALCC 14 (20 March 2025)
The court found that the First and Second Respondents' right of residence was derivative of employment and family life, not independent. Their status as occupiers arose after 4 February 1997, making section 11 of ESTA applicable. The termination of employment was procedurally fair, with proper disciplinary proceedings and notices served. The respondents failed to challenge their dismissal or make representations regarding termination of residence. The municipality's inability to provide alternative accommodation was considered, but the absence of such accommodation does not automatically bar eviction. The constitutional duty to provide housing rests with the state, not the applicants. The...
- Citation
- [2025] ZALCC 14
- Parties
- Applicant: Alewyn Petrus Burger (JNR) as N.O of the AP Burger Familie Trust (IT: 1482/94); Applicant: Alewyn Petrus Burger (JNR); Applicant: Alewyn Petrus Burger (SNR); Respondent: Johannes Thomas Schrader; Respondent: Mina Schrader; Respondent: All persons residing with or under the First to Second Respondents on Eikenhof Farm; Respondent: Langeberg Municipality; Respondent: Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2025
- Case Number
- LANC01R/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Automatic Review / Automatic Review of Eviction Order From Magistrate's Court Under ESTA
- Outcome
- Eviction order confirmed in part and substituted in part; respondents to vacate property by 30 May 2025, with provision for emergency housing.
- Judges
- Ntshalintshali MC
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Eviction Procedure, Right to Family Life, Just and Equitable Termination, Municipal Housing Obligation, Constitutional Right to Housing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alewyn Petrus Burger (JNR) as N.O of the AP Burger Familie Trust (IT: 1482/94)
Applicant
Alewyn Petrus Burger (JNR)
Applicant
Alewyn Petrus Burger (SNR)
Applicant
Johannes Thomas Schrader
Respondent
Mina Schrader
Respondent
All persons residing with or under the First to Second Respondents on Eikenhof Farm
Respondent
Langeberg Municipality
Respondent
Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Automatic Review / Automatic Review of Eviction Order From Magistrate's Court Under ESTA
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First and Second Respondents became occupiers on the farm before or after 4 February 1997.
- 2 Whether the eviction falls under section 10 or section 11 of ESTA.
- 3 Whether the right of occupation was lawfully cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the First and Second Respondents' right of residence was derivative of employment and family life, not independent. Their status as occupiers arose after 4 February 1997, making section 11 of ESTA applicable. The termination of employment was procedurally fair, with proper disciplinary proceedings and notices served. The respondents failed to challenge their dismissal or make representations regarding termination of residence. The municipality's inability to provide alternative accommodation was considered, but the absence of such accommodation does not automatically bar eviction. The constitutional duty to provide housing rests with the state, not the applicants. The...
Court Disposition
Eviction order confirmed in part and substituted in part; respondents to vacate property by 30 May 2025, with provision for emergency housing.
Orders
- The order of Magistrate Mr F. Van Deventer of 20 September 2024 is confirmed in part and substituted in part as set out below.
- The First to Third Respondents are ordered to vacate Eikenhof Farm on or before 30 May 2025; failing which, the Sheriff is authorized to evict them on 7 June 2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment