Burger v Catherine Isabel Crafford vha Pasadena Eiendomme (A343/2007) [2008] ZAFSHC 140 (23 October 2008)

Burger v Catherine Isabel Crafford vha Pasadena Eiendomme (A343/2007) [2008] ZAFSHC 140 (23 October 2008)

The court found that the respondent's introduction of the purchaser to the property was the dominant and effective cause of the sale. Although another agency later became involved and exerted pressure on the purchaser, the respondent's initial introduction created the purchaser's interest, which persisted until the sale was concluded. The evidence presented by the respondent and her witnesses was unchallenged and accepted by the trial court. The subsequent actions of Meandra Loots Eiendomme did not materially alter the purchaser's decision, but merely facilitated the final steps. Therefore, the respondent was entitled to the commission as per the mandate, and the appeal could not succeed.

Citation
[2008] ZAFSHC 140
Parties
Appellant: Alwyn Petrus Burger; Respondent: Catherine Isabel Crafford vha Pasadena Eiendomme
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 October 2008
Case Number
A343/2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Van der Merwe, R, Ploos van Amstel, WND R
Legal Topics
Estate Agent Commission, Effective Cause, Mandate Contract, Sale of Property
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Land and Property Estate Agent Commission Effective Cause Mandate Contract Sale of Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alwyn Petrus Burger

Appellant

Catherine Isabel Crafford vha Pasadena Eiendomme

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was the effective cause of the sale of the appellant's property.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to payment of the commission as claimed.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court correctly accepted the respondent's evidence as unchallenged.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's introduction of the purchaser to the property was the dominant and effective cause of the sale. Although another agency later became involved and exerted pressure on the purchaser, the respondent's initial introduction created the purchaser's interest, which persisted until the sale was concluded. The evidence presented by the respondent and her witnesses was unchallenged and accepted by the trial court. The subsequent actions of Meandra Loots Eiendomme did not materially alter the purchaser's decision, but merely facilitated the final steps. Therefore, the respondent was entitled to the commission as per the mandate, and the appeal could not succeed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.