Business Venture Investments No 1347 (Pty) Ltd v DD’s Cash and Carry (Pty) Ltd (63/LM/OCT10) [2010] ZACT 79 (17 November 2010)

Business Venture Investments No 1347 (Pty) Ltd v DD’s Cash and Carry (Pty) Ltd (63/LM/OCT10) [2010] ZACT 79 (17 November 2010)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. There is a horizontal overlap in wholesale grocery trade to LSM 2-6 customers in Gauteng, but sufficient effective competitors exist to curb anti-competitive behaviour. The vertical...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] ZACT 79
Parties
Applicant: Business Venture Investments No 1347 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: DD’s Cash and Carry (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
63/LM/OCT10
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Merger Approval
Outcome
The merger is approved unconditionally.
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andreas Wessels
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Horizontal Overlap, Vertical Relationship, Public Interest, Market Definition
Competition Law Merger Control Horizontal Overlap Vertical Relationship Public Interest Market Definition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Business Venture Investments No 1347 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

DD’s Cash and Carry (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Control / Merger Approval

  1. 1 Whether the proposed acquisition would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether there are any public interest concerns arising from the transaction.
  3. 3 Whether minority shareholder protections are sufficient.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. There is a horizontal overlap in wholesale grocery trade to LSM 2-6 customers in Gauteng, but sufficient effective competitors exist to curb anti-competitive behaviour. The vertical relationship between the parties is insignificant and does not raise foreclosure concerns. No public interest issues arise, and minority shareholder protections are in place. The transaction is approved unconditionally.

Court Disposition

The merger is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The acquisition of DD’s Cash and Carry (Pty) Ltd by Business Venture Investments No 1347 (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.