Calfshelf Investments 160 (Pty) Ltd and Rib World Two (Pty) Ltd (76/LM/Jul07) [2007] ZACT 57 (5 September 2007)

Calfshelf Investments 160 (Pty) Ltd and Rib World Two (Pty) Ltd (76/LM/Jul07) [2007] ZACT 57 (5 September 2007)

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging firms in the relevant markets, specifically in the manufacture and distribution of meat products and grocery products. There is no vertical integration between the parties, and the target firm does not purchase grocery products in bulk from the acquiring group or its competitors. The transaction does not raise any public interest concerns, including those related to BEE status or shareholder exit. Accordingly, the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market and is approved unconditionally.

Citation
[2007] ZACT 57
Parties
Applicant: Calfshelf Investments 160 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Rib World Two (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 September 2007
Case Number
76/LM/Jul07
Procedural Posture
Merger Clearance / Decision
Outcome
Merger approved unconditionally.
Judges
D Lewis, N Manoim, L Reyburn
Legal Topics
Merger Clearance, Substantial Lessening of Competition, Public Interest, Vertical Integration, Market Overlap
Competition Law Merger Clearance Substantial Lessening of Competition Public Interest Vertical Integration Market Overlap

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Calfshelf Investments 160 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Rib World Two (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Clearance / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger between Calfshelf Investments 160 (Pty) Ltd and Rib World Two (Pty) Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether there are any public interest concerns arising from the transaction.
  3. 3 Whether there is any vertical integration or market overlap between the merging parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging firms in the relevant markets, specifically in the manufacture and distribution of meat products and grocery products. There is no vertical integration between the parties, and the target firm does not purchase grocery products in bulk from the acquiring group or its competitors. The transaction does not raise any public interest concerns, including those related to BEE status or shareholder exit. Accordingly, the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market and is approved unconditionally.

Court Disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Calfshelf Investments 160 (Pty) Ltd and Rib World Two (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.