Campher v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR2187/17) [2020] ZALCJHB 107 (25 June 2020)
The court found that the applicant was employed on a fixed term contract, but the evidence established a reasonable expectation of renewal based on SABC's practice and assurances from senior managers. The Commissioner failed to properly consider uncontested evidence supporting the applicant's expectation and misconceived the nature of the enquiry, resulting in an unreasonable award. The SABC did not prove that the dismissal was procedurally or substantively fair, nor did it show that reinstatement was not reasonably practicable. Consequently, the arbitration award was reviewed and set aside, and the applicant was ordered to be reinstated with full back pay.
- Citation
- [2020] ZALCJHB 107
- Parties
- Applicant: Maria Christina Campher; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Thembekile Nsibanyoni; Respondent: South African Broadcasting Corporation SOC Limited
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Case Number
- JR2187/17
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Arbitration award reviewed and set aside; applicant reinstated with full back pay; costs awarded against the third respondent.
- Judges
- P Nkutha-Nkontwana
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Fixed Term Contracts, Reasonable Expectation of Renewal, Reinstatement, Remedies for Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maria Christina Campher
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Thembekile Nsibanyoni
Respondent
South African Broadcasting Corporation SOC Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was employed on a permanent or fixed term contract at the time of dismissal.
- 2 Whether the applicant had a reasonable expectation that her fixed term contract would be renewed.
- 3 Whether the dismissal of the applicant was procedurally and substantively fair.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was employed on a fixed term contract, but the evidence established a reasonable expectation of renewal based on SABC's practice and assurances from senior managers. The Commissioner failed to properly consider uncontested evidence supporting the applicant's expectation and misconceived the nature of the enquiry, resulting in an unreasonable award. The SABC did not prove that the dismissal was procedurally or substantively fair, nor did it show that reinstatement was not reasonably practicable. Consequently, the arbitration award was reviewed and set aside, and the applicant was ordered to be reinstated with full back pay.
Court Disposition
Arbitration award reviewed and set aside; applicant reinstated with full back pay; costs awarded against the third respondent.
Orders
- The arbitration award dated 12 September 2017 under case number GAJB25668-16 is reviewed and set aside.
- The dismissal of Ms Maria Christina Campher was procedurally and substantively unfair.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment