Camps Bay Ratepayers and Residents Association and Another v Harrison and Another (CCT 76/12) [2012] ZACC 17; 2012 (11) BCLR 1143 (CC) (20 September 2012)
The Court found that the Taxing Master's award of R240 000 for senior counsel and R160 000 for junior counsel, plus VAT, was excessive and disproportionate to what was fair and reasonable. The litigation history showed that the main issues had already been thoroughly traversed in previous courts, and the constitutional challenge did not justify the high fees. The Court held that reasonable remuneration for counsel's work in this appeal should be R180 000 for senior counsel and R120 000 for junior counsel, plus VAT. The Taxing Master's award was set aside and substituted with these amounts. The judgment emphasised the need for moderation in counsel's fees, especially in the context of...
- Citation
- [2012] ZACC 17
- Parties
- Applicant: Camps Bay Ratepayers’ and Residents’ Association; Applicant: P S Booksellers (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Gerda Yvonne Ada Harrison; Respondent: Municipality of the City of Cape Town
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2012
- Case Number
- CCT 76/12
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Review of Taxing Master's Allocatur on Counsel's Fees
- Outcome
- Review succeeded; Taxing Master's award set aside and substituted with lower amounts for counsel's fees.
- Judges
- Mogoeng, Moseneke, Cameron, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Nkabinde, Skweyiya, Van der Westhuizen, Yacoob, Zondo
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Party and Party Costs, Counsel Fees, Review of Taxing Master, Constitutional Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Camps Bay Ratepayers’ and Residents’ Association
Applicant
P S Booksellers (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Gerda Yvonne Ada Harrison
Respondent
Municipality of the City of Cape Town
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Review of Taxing Master's Allocatur on Counsel's Fees
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Taxing Master's award of counsel's fees was excessive and should be set aside.
- 2 Whether previous litigation history and the nature of the issues justified the fees allowed.
- 3 Whether the Guideline for counsel's fees applied in this Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Taxing Master's award of R240 000 for senior counsel and R160 000 for junior counsel, plus VAT, was excessive and disproportionate to what was fair and reasonable. The litigation history showed that the main issues had already been thoroughly traversed in previous courts, and the constitutional challenge did not justify the high fees. The Court held that reasonable remuneration for counsel's work in this appeal should be R180 000 for senior counsel and R120 000 for junior counsel, plus VAT. The Taxing Master's award was set aside and substituted with these amounts. The judgment emphasised the need for moderation in counsel's fees, especially in the context of...
Court Disposition
Review succeeded; Taxing Master's award set aside and substituted with lower amounts for counsel's fees.
Orders
- The review succeeds.
- The Taxing Master's award (allocatur) in respect of counsel's fees in this Court is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment