Cancellation of time share agreement (201602-0006059) [2016] ZACGSO 9 (22 March 2016)
The consumer did not cancel the agreement within the contractual or statutory cooling off period. However, both the Consumer Protection Act and the National Credit Act apply concurrently to the transaction, and the provision that extends greater protection to the consumer prevails. The supplier may impose a reasonable cancellation penalty, but it must be based on actual costs and not negate the consumer's right to cancel. The supplier is required to mitigate its loss by finding an alternative consumer. The recommended resolution is that the supplier accept the cancellation and reimburse the deposit paid, less any expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the sale of the goods, with...
- Citation
- [2016] ZACGSO 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Miss M.; Respondent: Supplier (unnamed)
- Court
- Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2016
- Case Number
- 201602-0006059
- Procedural Posture
- Consumer Complaint / Recommendation
- Outcome
- Recommended that the supplier accept cancellation and reimburse the deposit paid, less reasonable expenses incurred.
- Judges
- N Melville
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Protection Act, National Credit Act, Cancellation of Agreement, Cooling Off Period, Reasonable Cancellation Penalty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss M.
Applicant
Supplier (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consumer Complaint / Recommendation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consumer is entitled to cancel the timeshare agreement and obtain a refund of the deposit paid.
- 2 Whether the cancellation occurred within the contractual or statutory cooling off period.
- 3 Whether the supplier may impose a reasonable cancellation penalty under the Consumer Protection Act or National Credit Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The consumer did not cancel the agreement within the contractual or statutory cooling off period. However, both the Consumer Protection Act and the National Credit Act apply concurrently to the transaction, and the provision that extends greater protection to the consumer prevails. The supplier may impose a reasonable cancellation penalty, but it must be based on actual costs and not negate the consumer's right to cancel. The supplier is required to mitigate its loss by finding an alternative consumer. The recommended resolution is that the supplier accept the cancellation and reimburse the deposit paid, less any expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the sale of the goods, with...
Court Disposition
Recommended that the supplier accept cancellation and reimburse the deposit paid, less reasonable expenses incurred.
Orders
- The supplier is to accept the cancellation of the agreement.
- The supplier must reimburse the consumer the deposit paid, less any expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the sale of the goods.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment