Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers Limited (“caxton”) and Naspers Limited (“Naspers”) & Others (72/CAC/Aug 2007) [2007] ZACT 72 (5 October 2007)

Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers Limited (“caxton”) and Naspers Limited (“Naspers”) & Others (72/CAC/Aug 2007) [2007] ZACT 72 (5 October 2007)

The court held that the Competition Tribunal acted within its powers by limiting the scope of Caxton's intervention in the merger proceedings. The Tribunal's discretion under section 53(1)(c)(v) of the Competition Act is broad but must be exercised judicially to ensure orderly and expeditious hearings. Unlimited intervention would undermine the efficiency and relevance of the proceedings, potentially leading to delays and confusion. The Tribunal's order was not ultra vires, nor did it exceed its jurisdiction or improperly exercise its discretion. Rule 46 is not ultra vires the Act, as it serves the purpose of clarifying the issues to be addressed and maintaining control over the...

Citation
[2007] ZACT 72
Parties
Applicant: Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers Limited; Respondent: Naspers Limited; Respondent: Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net); Respondent: Supersport International Holdings Limited (Supersport); Respondent: The Competition Commission; Respondent: The Competition Tribunal
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 October 2007
Case Number
72/CAC/Aug 2007
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Urgent Review of Tribunal's Intervention Order
Outcome
Review application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Levinsohn, Davis, Mailula
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Intervention Rights, Scope of Participation, Competition Act Section 53, Judicial Discretion
Competition Law Civil Procedure Merger Control Intervention Rights Scope of Participation Competition Act Section 53 Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Caxton and CTP Publishers and Printers Limited

Applicant

Naspers Limited

Respondent

Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net)

Respondent

Supersport International Holdings Limited (Supersport)

Respondent

The Competition Commission

Respondent

The Competition Tribunal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment on Urgent Review of Tribunal's Intervention Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Competition Tribunal acted ultra vires or exceeded its jurisdiction by limiting the scope of Caxton's intervention in merger proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal's order improperly curtailed Caxton's rights to raise issues in the merger hearing.
  3. 3 Whether Rule 46 of the Tribunal rules is ultra vires the Competition Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Competition Tribunal acted within its powers by limiting the scope of Caxton's intervention in the merger proceedings. The Tribunal's discretion under section 53(1)(c)(v) of the Competition Act is broad but must be exercised judicially to ensure orderly and expeditious hearings. Unlimited intervention would undermine the efficiency and relevance of the proceedings, potentially leading to delays and confusion. The Tribunal's order was not ultra vires, nor did it exceed its jurisdiction or improperly exercise its discretion. Rule 46 is not ultra vires the Act, as it serves the purpose of clarifying the issues to be addressed and maintaining control over the...

Court Disposition

Review application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The review application is dismissed.
  • Costs are awarded against the applicant, including the costs of two counsel.