Cellular Insurance Managers (Pty) Ltd v Foshini Retail Group (Pty) Ltd (12262/07) [2010] ZAWCHC 159 (14 June 2010)
- Citation
- [2010] ZAWCHC 159
- Status
- Ruling
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Panel
- Fourie
- Case number
- 12262/07
More details
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Panel
- Fourie
- Case number
- 12262/07
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success regarding the statutory defence under Section 48 of the Short Term Insurance Act. However, the court acknowledged that another court might reasonably reach a different conclusion on the contractual claim, and therefore granted leave to appeal on that issue. The matter was deemed to merit the attention of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Court disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal on the contractual claim; costs to be costs in the appeal.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal against the judgment and orders made on 11 May 2010, on the grounds set forth in paragraphs 8 to 23 of its notice of application for leave to appeal dated 20 May 2010.
- The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.
02
Material facts
Parties
Cellular Insurance Managers (Pty) Limited
ApplicantFoshini Retail Group (Pty) Limited
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Orders Delivered on 11 May 2010.
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant has demonstrated reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
- 02
Whether leave to appeal should be granted regarding the contractual claim decided in favour of the respondent.
- 03
Whether the defence based on Section 48 of the Short Term Insurance Act, No. 5 of 1998, warrants reconsideration by another court.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant contends that the judgment and orders delivered on 11 May 2010 were incorrect and that there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion, particularly regarding the contractual claim and the defence based on Section 48 of the Short Term Insurance Act.
- Respondent
- The respondent opposes the application for leave to appeal, arguing that the applicant has not shown reasonable prospects of success and that the judgment on the contractual claim and the statutory defence was correct.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, 10 of 2013
An applicant for leave to appeal must show reasonable prospects that another court may come to a different conclusion.
- 02
Short Term Insurance Act, No. 5 of 1998
A defence based on Section 48 of the Short Term Insurance Act must be evaluated on its merits to determine if it could alter the outcome.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success regarding the statutory defence under Section 48 of the Short Term Insurance Act. However, the court acknowledged that another court might reasonably reach a different conclusion on the contractual claim, and therefore granted leave to appeal on that issue. The matter was deemed to merit the attention of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Obiter and limits
- The court noted that while it was not persuaded by the statutory defence, it could not exclude the possibility of a different outcome on the contractual claim before another court.
- The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.
Court disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal on the contractual claim; costs to be costs in the appeal.
- The applicant is granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal against the judgment and orders made on 11 May 2010, on the grounds set forth in paragraphs 8 to 23 of its notice of application for leave to appeal dated 20 May 2010.
- The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.
Source and reliance status
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Ruling
IN THE
HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(WESTERN CAPE. HIGH COURT. CAPE TOWN)
CASE NUMBER: 12262/07
DATE: 14 JUNE 2010
In the matter between:
CELLULAR
INSURANCE MANAGERS
(PTY) LIMITED Applicant
and
FOSCHINI RETAIL GROUP (PTY) LIMITED Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Application for Leave to Appeal)
FOURIE.J:
Applicant seeks leave to appeal against the whole of my judgment and orders made on 11 May 2010. The application is opposed
It is trite to succeed in an application of this nature, the applicant has to show that it has a reasonable prospect of success on appeal.
I have considered the grounds of appeal relied upon by applicant, as well as the submissions made on behalf of both parties. I am not persuaded that applicant has shown that there is a reasonable prospect that another Court may come to a different conclusion on the defence based on Section 48 of the Short Term Insurance Act, No. 5 of 1998.
In regard to the contractual claim on which I found in favour of the respondent, I believe that I have come to the correct decision.
However, I cannot rule out the possibility that another court may reasonably come to a different conclusion on this issue. In the
result I am persuaded that leave to appeal should be granted on this issue. In my view, the matter merits the attention of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
In the result the following order is made:
The applicant is granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal against my judgment and orders made on 11 May 2010, on the grounds set forth in paragraphs 8 to 23 of its notice of application for leave to appeal dated 20 May 2010;
The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.
FOURIE.J
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.