Central Developments Tshwane (Pty) Ltd and Another v Body Corporate, Twee Riviere Aftree Oord (635/2019) [2020] ZASCA 107 (21 September 2020)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Body Corporate's power to institute proceedings for damage to common property is conferred by section 2(7)(b) of the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act, and is not subject to the requirement of a special resolution under section 2(7)(e). The special plea was based on a misconception of the statutory scheme, as the power to sue for damage to common property exists independently of the special resolution requirement, which applies only to other types of claims against the developer. The appeal was dismissed, and the orders relating to ratification and costs were set aside as unnecessary.
- Citation
- [2020] ZASCA 107
- Parties
- Appellant: Central Developments Tshwane (Pty) Ltd t/a Central Developments Property Group; Appellant: Wilcoprop 202 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Body Corporate of Twee Riviere Aftree Oord (Sectional Title Scheme SS0052110)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2020
- Case Number
- 635/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of High Court, Pretoria
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. The special plea is dismissed. Each party to pay its own costs in both the High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal.
- Judges
- Wallis, Molemela, Plasket, Ledwaba, Unterhalter
- Legal Topics
- Sectional Title Schemes Management Act, Body Corporate Powers, Special Resolution Requirement, Developer Liability, Damage to Common Property, Ratification of Resolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Central Developments Tshwane (Pty) Ltd t/a Central Developments Property Group
Appellant
Wilcoprop 202 (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Body Corporate of Twee Riviere Aftree Oord (Sectional Title Scheme SS0052110)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of High Court, Pretoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Body Corporate required a special resolution to institute action against the developer for damage to common property.
- 2 Whether section 2(7)(b) of the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act confers power on the Body Corporate to sue for damage to common property without a special resolution.
- 3 Whether the special plea based on the absence of a special resolution was valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Body Corporate's power to institute proceedings for damage to common property is conferred by section 2(7)(b) of the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act, and is not subject to the requirement of a special resolution under section 2(7)(e). The special plea was based on a misconception of the statutory scheme, as the power to sue for damage to common property exists independently of the special resolution requirement, which applies only to other types of claims against the developer. The appeal was dismissed, and the orders relating to ratification and costs were set aside as unnecessary.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. The special plea is dismissed. Each party to pay its own costs in both the High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The order of the High Court is set aside and replaced by: 'The special plea is dismissed. Each party is to pay its own costs relating to the preparation and argument of the special plea.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment