Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Erasmus and Another, Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Cleophas and Another, Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Frederick and Anothers (18153/09, 14229/09, 11973/09) [2009] ZAWCHC 175 (12 November 2009)

Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Erasmus and Another, Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Cleophas and Another, Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Frederick and Anothers (18153/09, 14229/09, 11973/09) [2009] ZAWCHC 175 (12 November 2009)

The court held that, given the uncertainty and apparent deficiencies in the debt review process conducted by the debt counsellor, and the constitutional implications of authorising the sale in execution of the defendants' homes, it would be inappropriate to grant summary judgment at this stage. The interests of justice and the objects of the National Credit Act require that defendants be properly afforded the protections and opportunities intended by the Act. The court exercised its discretion to adjourn the summary judgment applications sine die and directed an enquiry into the conduct of the debt counsellor, specifically whether the statutory obligations under the NCA were properly...

Citation
[2009] ZAWCHC 175
Parties
Applicant: Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO; Respondent: Lucas Marthinus Erasmus; Respondent: Marlene Erasmus; Respondent: Brenden Patrick Cleophas; Respondent: Chantal Chrystaline Jephtas; Respondent: Jan Christoffel Philippus Fredericks; Respondent: Anna Francina Fredericks
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 November 2009
Case Number
18153/09, 14229/09, 11973/09
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Motion Court; Summary Judgment Applications Adjourned Sine Die Pending Further Enquiry
Outcome
Summary judgment applications adjourned sine die pending further enquiry into the debt review process.
Judges
A.G. Binns-Ward
Legal Topics
National Credit Act, Summary Judgment, Judicial Oversight, Right to Housing, Debt Review, Mortgage Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO

Applicant

Lucas Marthinus Erasmus

Respondent

Marlene Erasmus

Respondent

Brenden Patrick Cleophas

Respondent

Chantal Chrystaline Jephtas

Respondent

Jan Christoffel Philippus Fredericks

Respondent

Anna Francina Fredericks

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Motion Court; Summary Judgment Applications Adjourned Sine Die Pending Further Enquiry

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should be granted against defendants in light of ongoing or incomplete debt review processes under the National Credit Act.
  2. 2 Whether the sale in execution of defendants' homes without proper judicial oversight infringes their constitutional rights under section 26.
  3. 3 Whether the debt counsellor properly discharged statutory obligations under the NCA before termination of debt review and institution of proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, given the uncertainty and apparent deficiencies in the debt review process conducted by the debt counsellor, and the constitutional implications of authorising the sale in execution of the defendants' homes, it would be inappropriate to grant summary judgment at this stage. The interests of justice and the objects of the National Credit Act require that defendants be properly afforded the protections and opportunities intended by the Act. The court exercised its discretion to adjourn the summary judgment applications sine die and directed an enquiry into the conduct of the debt counsellor, specifically whether the statutory obligations under the NCA were properly...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment applications adjourned sine die pending further enquiry into the debt review process.

Orders

  • The application for summary judgment in each case is adjourned sine die.
  • The plaintiff is directed through the Sheriff to serve a copy of this order and the judgment on the National Credit Regulator and the relevant debt counsellor.