Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd NO v Ramabe (37524/2020) [2023] ZAGPJHC 504 (18 May 2023)
The defendant failed to raise any substantive defence to the plaintiff's claim for payment under the loan agreement. The plaintiff proved compliance with section 129 of the National Credit Act by serving the required notice at the defendant's domicilium address, as evidenced by the sheriff's return. The defendant's bare denial of service and reference to COVID-19 measures do not constitute valid defences. The property was mortgaged as security for the debt, and the defendant provided no evidence of sufficient movable assets to satisfy the debt. Given the increasing arrears and lack of equity, it is appropriate to declare the property executable and set a reserve price based on the average...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 504
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Changing Tides 17 Proprietary Limited N.O.; Defendant: Ramabe, Mashakeng Frans
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2023
- Case Number
- 37524/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of the outstanding loan amount, interest as per the loan agreement, declaration of the property as executable with a reserve price, and costs on attorney and client scale.
- Judges
- RJ Moultrie
- Legal Topics
- Loan Agreement Breach, National Credit Act Compliance, Summary Judgment, Special Executability, Reserve Price Determination, Enforcement Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Changing Tides 17 Proprietary Limited N.O.
Plaintiff
Ramabe, Mashakeng Frans
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has raised a substantive defence to the plaintiff's claim for payment under the loan agreement.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff complied with section 129 of the National Credit Act regarding service of notice.
- 3 Whether the mortgaged property should be declared specially executable and a reserve price set.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to raise any substantive defence to the plaintiff's claim for payment under the loan agreement. The plaintiff proved compliance with section 129 of the National Credit Act by serving the required notice at the defendant's domicilium address, as evidenced by the sheriff's return. The defendant's bare denial of service and reference to COVID-19 measures do not constitute valid defences. The property was mortgaged as security for the debt, and the defendant provided no evidence of sufficient movable assets to satisfy the debt. Given the increasing arrears and lack of equity, it is appropriate to declare the property executable and set a reserve price based on the average...
Court Disposition
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for payment of the outstanding loan amount, interest as per the loan agreement, declaration of the property as executable with a reserve price, and costs on attorney and client scale.
Orders
- Payment of R650,223.77 by the defendant to the plaintiff.
- Interest on the above amount at the base rate defined in the loan agreement plus 3.80% per annum, compounded monthly in arrears from 21 October 2020 to date of payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment