Charles Velkes Mail Order 1973 (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue (306/85) [1987] ZASCA 40; [1987] 2 All SA 275 (A) (12 May 1987)
The court held that the appellant failed to prove that the distribution of catalogues constituted sales within the meaning of section 5(1)(a) of the Sales Tax Act. There was insufficient evidence of acceptance or intention to acquire ownership by the recipients, and the catalogues were unsolicited advertising material. The court found that the catalogues were used by the appellant in its enterprise, falling under section 5(1)(h)(i), and that tax was correctly calculated on their cost. The exemption for exported goods did not apply, as there was no sale involved in the distribution abroad. The appeal was dismissed, and the assessment confirmed.
- Citation
- [1987] ZASCA 40
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Velkes Mail Order 1973 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commissioner for Inland Revenue
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 1987
- Case Number
- 306/85
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Cape Income Tax Special Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Corbett, Hoexter, Nestadt, Nicholas, Steyn
- Legal Topics
- Sales Tax Act 103 of 1978, Taxable Value Determination, Definition of Sale, Vendor Liability, Exemption for Exported Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Velkes Mail Order 1973 (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Commissioner for Inland Revenue
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Cape Income Tax Special Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the distribution of catalogues by the appellant constituted sales of goods within the meaning of section 5(1)(a) of the Sales Tax Act 103 of 1978.
- 2 Whether the appellant is liable for sales tax on catalogues distributed both within and outside the Republic, and if so, on what value.
- 3 Whether the exemption for exported goods under section 6(1)(a)(i) applies to catalogues sent abroad.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the appellant failed to prove that the distribution of catalogues constituted sales within the meaning of section 5(1)(a) of the Sales Tax Act. There was insufficient evidence of acceptance or intention to acquire ownership by the recipients, and the catalogues were unsolicited advertising material. The court found that the catalogues were used by the appellant in its enterprise, falling under section 5(1)(h)(i), and that tax was correctly calculated on their cost. The exemption for exported goods did not apply, as there was no sale involved in the distribution abroad. The appeal was dismissed, and the assessment confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs, including those of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment