Chater Technologies v Cooper NO and Another (09/49154) [2010] ZAGPPHC 81 (30 July 2010)

Chater Technologies v Cooper NO and Another (09/49154) [2010] ZAGPPHC 81 (30 July 2010)

The court found that the exception raised by the defendants was not sustainable, as the particulars of claim were sufficient to disclose a cause of action. The exception was accordingly dismissed. The court exercised its discretion regarding costs, ordering the defendants to pay 50% of the plaintiff's costs on a party and party scale, and the plaintiff to pay the reserved costs of the defendants on an opposed party and party scale.

Citation
[2010] ZAGPPHC 81
Parties
Plaintiff: Chater Technologies; Defendant: Cooper N.O.; Defendant: Hendrie Andrie Marais N.O.
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 July 2010
Case Number
09/49154
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Exception
Outcome
Exception dismissed; costs orders made.
Judges
Goodey AJ
Legal Topics
Exception Procedure, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Exception Procedure Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chater Technologies

Plaintiff

Cooper N.O.

Defendant

Hendrie Andrie Marais N.O.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Procedure / Exception

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the exception raised by the defendants should be upheld or dismissed.
  2. 2 Determination of the appropriate costs order following the dismissal of the exception.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the exception raised by the defendants was not sustainable, as the particulars of claim were sufficient to disclose a cause of action. The exception was accordingly dismissed. The court exercised its discretion regarding costs, ordering the defendants to pay 50% of the plaintiff's costs on a party and party scale, and the plaintiff to pay the reserved costs of the defendants on an opposed party and party scale.

Court Disposition

Exception dismissed; costs orders made.

Orders

  • The exception is dismissed.
  • The defendants are to pay 50% of the plaintiff's costs on a party and party scale.