Cheba and Others v Minister of Police and Others (520/2018) [2018] ZALMPPHC 6 (13 February 2018)
The court found that the applicants are victims of human trafficking and their detention at the Khuseleka One Stop Centre is governed by the Prevention and Combatting of Human Trafficking Act, 2013 (PCTPA). Although the respondents failed to comply with certain statutory obligations, including informing the applicants of their right to apply for a visitor's visa and initiating the prescribed processes, the detention itself is not unlawful. The interests of the State in prosecuting human traffickers and protecting victims outweigh the applicants' immediate desire to be treated as asylum seekers. The applicants' rights under the Constitution and PCTPA must be safeguarded, and the...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALMPPHC 6
- Parties
- Applicant: Kasune Abera Cheba; Applicant: Mehrafu Lobegchio; Applicant: Aeyala Gentamo Mantahso; Applicant: Tarekne Orghso Haremo; Applicant: Fekele Anulo Hilboro; Respondent: Minister of Police & Others; Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs; Respondent: Director of the Hawks; Respondent: Senior Public Prosecutor, Polokwane Magistrates Court; Respondent: Manager, Polokwane Place of Safety
- Court
- Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2018
- Case Number
- 520/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination in Urgent Motion Court
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs. Directives issued for compliance with the Prevention and Combatting of Human Trafficking Act, 2013.
- Judges
- D Nair
- Legal Topics
- Human Trafficking, Asylum Seekers, Detention Without Trial, Visitor Visa, Constitutional Rights, Refugee Status
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kasune Abera Cheba
Applicant
Mehrafu Lobegchio
Applicant
Aeyala Gentamo Mantahso
Applicant
Tarekne Orghso Haremo
Applicant
Fekele Anulo Hilboro
Applicant
Minister of Police & Others
Respondent
Minister of Home Affairs
Respondent
Director of the Hawks
Respondent
Senior Public Prosecutor, Polokwane Magistrates Court
Respondent
Manager, Polokwane Place of Safety
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination in Urgent Motion Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' detention at the Khuseleka One Stop Centre is lawful under the Prevention and Combatting of Human Trafficking Act, 2013.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to immediate release and the issuance of asylum seeker permits under the Refugee Act.
- 3 Whether the respondents complied with statutory obligations regarding the rights and treatment of victims of human trafficking.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants are victims of human trafficking and their detention at the Khuseleka One Stop Centre is governed by the Prevention and Combatting of Human Trafficking Act, 2013 (PCTPA). Although the respondents failed to comply with certain statutory obligations, including informing the applicants of their right to apply for a visitor's visa and initiating the prescribed processes, the detention itself is not unlawful. The interests of the State in prosecuting human traffickers and protecting victims outweigh the applicants' immediate desire to be treated as asylum seekers. The applicants' rights under the Constitution and PCTPA must be safeguarded, and the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs. Directives issued for compliance with the Prevention and Combatting of Human Trafficking Act, 2013.
Orders
- The matter is declared urgent and time periods and forms of service are dispensed with.
- The application for release from the Khuseleka One Stop Centre is dismissed with costs. Applicants are placed in temporary safe care at the Centre pending transfer to an accredited organisation within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment