Chetty v Italtile Ceramics Ltd (34660/2009) [2011] ZAGPPHC 183 (23 September 2011)
The court, after considering the judgment, the grounds of appeal, and oral submissions, finds that there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion. The cause of action and the legal question involved are largely unexplored and merit the attention of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted.
- Citation
- [2011] ZAGPPHC 183
- Parties
- Applicant: Dhayalan Chockanathan Chetty; Respondent: Italtile Ceramics Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2011
- Case Number
- 34660/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal is granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal against the whole judgment and orders delivered on 13 July 2011.
- Judges
- MN Makgoka
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospects of Success
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dhayalan Chockanathan Chetty
Applicant
Italtile Ceramics Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion.
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, after considering the judgment, the grounds of appeal, and oral submissions, finds that there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion. The cause of action and the legal question involved are largely unexplored and merit the attention of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal is granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal against the whole judgment and orders delivered on 13 July 2011.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal against the whole judgment and orders of this court delivered on 13 July 2011.
- Costs of this application are costs in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment