Chibane and Another v Premier of Province of Kwazulu-Natal (DA15/2024) [2025] ZALAC 44 (15 July 2025)
The Labour Appeal Court held that the Labour Court does not have general jurisdiction to intervene in incomplete disciplinary proceedings or to grant declaratory relief regarding delay and waiver unless specifically conferred by statute. The pleadings did not invoke any statutory provision or contractual basis for the claims advanced, and no permissible ground for review was articulated. The Labour Court was correct to refuse to entertain the review application in medias res, as there is a general rule against reviewing interlocutory rulings mid-process absent exceptional circumstances. The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to establish a statutory basis for their claims or...
- Citation
- [2025] ZALAC 44
- Parties
- Appellant: Ziphate Mboneni Cibane; Appellant: Nonhlanhla Pamela Hlongwa; Respondent: Premier of the Province of Kwazulu-Natal; Respondent: RBG Choudree SC N.O.
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2025
- Case Number
- DA15/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Application to Quash Disciplinary Charges and Review Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk, Tokota, Basson
- Legal Topics
- Labour Court Jurisdiction, Disciplinary Proceedings, Unreasonable Delay, Waiver of Rights, Review of Interlocutory Ruling
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ziphate Mboneni Cibane
Appellant
Nonhlanhla Pamela Hlongwa
Appellant
Premier of the Province of Kwazulu-Natal
Respondent
RBG Choudree SC N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Application to Quash Disciplinary Charges and Review Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Labour Court have jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief regarding delay and waiver in disciplinary proceedings?
- 2 Is there a statutory basis for quashing disciplinary charges due to unreasonable delay or waiver?
- 3 Can the Labour Court review interlocutory rulings in incomplete disciplinary proceedings absent exceptional circumstances?
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that the Labour Court does not have general jurisdiction to intervene in incomplete disciplinary proceedings or to grant declaratory relief regarding delay and waiver unless specifically conferred by statute. The pleadings did not invoke any statutory provision or contractual basis for the claims advanced, and no permissible ground for review was articulated. The Labour Court was correct to refuse to entertain the review application in medias res, as there is a general rule against reviewing interlocutory rulings mid-process absent exceptional circumstances. The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to establish a statutory basis for their claims or...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Each party is to bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment