Chubb Guarding SA (Pty) Ltd v South African Transport and Allied Workers Union (LJ1281/05 , J1281/05) [2005] ZALC 29; [2005] 11 BLLR 1062 (LC); (2005) 26 ILJ 1670 (LC) (12 July 2005)
The court found that the right to embark on a secondary strike is more limited than the right to a primary strike, as reflected in the Labour Relations Act. The requirement of reasonableness and compliance with collective agreements is crucial, especially where the number of secondary strikers is disproportionately higher than primary strikers. The court held that the collective agreement must be respected and that the union and its members may not engage in secondary strike action until the dispute resolution procedures and periods in clause 13 have been complied with. The harm to the applicant if the strike proceeded would be severe, potentially leading to closure of its business, while...
- Citation
- [2005] ZALC 29
- Parties
- Applicant: Chubb Guarding SA (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: South African Transport and Allied Workers Union
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2005
- Case Number
- J1281/05
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Relief Application
- Outcome
- Final interdict granted against the respondent prohibiting secondary strike action until compliance with clause 13 of the collective agreement.
- Judges
- E Revelas
- Legal Topics
- Secondary Strike, Collective Agreement, Strike Interdict, Reasonableness Requirement, Protected Strike, Dispute Resolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chubb Guarding SA (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
South African Transport and Allied Workers Union
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Relief Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent and its members are prohibited from engaging in secondary strike action until the periods in clause 13 of the collective agreement have expired.
- 2 Whether the secondary strike is protected under the Labour Relations Act given the alleged non-compliance with the collective agreement.
- 3 Whether the disproportionate number of secondary strikers compared to primary strikers renders the secondary strike unreasonable.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the right to embark on a secondary strike is more limited than the right to a primary strike, as reflected in the Labour Relations Act. The requirement of reasonableness and compliance with collective agreements is crucial, especially where the number of secondary strikers is disproportionately higher than primary strikers. The court held that the collective agreement must be respected and that the union and its members may not engage in secondary strike action until the dispute resolution procedures and periods in clause 13 have been complied with. The harm to the applicant if the strike proceeded would be severe, potentially leading to closure of its business, while...
Court Disposition
Final interdict granted against the respondent prohibiting secondary strike action until compliance with clause 13 of the collective agreement.
Orders
- The respondent is interdicted from calling upon its members to participate in any secondary strike action in support of the primary strike engaged in by its members at Chubbs Security (Pty) Ltd unless it and its members have complied with clause 13 of the collective agreement dated 21 April 2004 applicable to the...
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment