Chubb Security SA (Pty) Ltd t/a Chubb Electronics Security v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 58/05) [2010] ZALC 266 (15 January 2010)
The court found that the commissioner failed to decide the point in limine regarding jurisdiction, which constituted a gross irregularity. The evidence showed that the fourth respondent alleged dismissal for union activities, making it an automatically unfair dismissal. According to the LRA, such disputes fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labour Court. The commissioner exceeded his powers by arbitrating the dispute and issuing an award. Consequently, the arbitration award was reviewed and set aside, and substituted with an order that the CCMA had no jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute.
- Citation
- [2010] ZALC 266
- Parties
- Applicant: Chubb Security SA (Pty) Ltd t/a Chubb Electronics Security; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA); Respondent: Commissioner N Mbelengwa; Respondent: South African Transport and Allied Workers Union (SATAWU); Respondent: Hlayisane Shadrack Motaung
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2010
- Case Number
- JR 58/05
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Application for review granted; arbitration award reviewed and set aside; CCMA found to have no jurisdiction.
- Judges
- Nyathela AJ
- Legal Topics
- Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Ccma, Review of Arbitration Award, Gross Irregularity, Union Activities, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chubb Security SA (Pty) Ltd t/a Chubb Electronics Security
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA)
Respondent
Commissioner N Mbelengwa
Respondent
South African Transport and Allied Workers Union (SATAWU)
Respondent
Hlayisane Shadrack Motaung
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CCMA had jurisdiction to arbitrate a dispute concerning an automatically unfair dismissal for union activities.
- 2 Whether the commissioner committed a gross irregularity by failing to decide the point in limine regarding jurisdiction.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award should be reviewed and set aside.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the commissioner failed to decide the point in limine regarding jurisdiction, which constituted a gross irregularity. The evidence showed that the fourth respondent alleged dismissal for union activities, making it an automatically unfair dismissal. According to the LRA, such disputes fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labour Court. The commissioner exceeded his powers by arbitrating the dispute and issuing an award. Consequently, the arbitration award was reviewed and set aside, and substituted with an order that the CCMA had no jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute.
Court Disposition
Application for review granted; arbitration award reviewed and set aside; CCMA found to have no jurisdiction.
Orders
- The award issued by the second respondent under case number GA 23309-03 dated 13 December 2004 is reviewed and set aside.
- The award is substituted with an order that the CCMA has no jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment