Cibi and Others v Public Service Commission and Others (3703/2019) [2022] ZAECMKHC 44 (28 July 2022)
The court found that the error in the attestation clause of the affidavit, referring to the deponent as 'he' instead of 'she', was a clerical oversight and did not invalidate the affidavit. The deponent was an attorney of the court, and there was no evidence that the affidavit was not properly commissioned. The court applied the principle that substantial compliance with the Regulations suffices and exercised its discretion to admit the affidavit. Regarding costs, the court held that the applicants had been dilatory in pursuing the matter, failing to secure legal representation for nearly a year and providing inadequate explanation for their delays. The applicants' conduct warranted...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAECMKHC 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Sonwabo Cibi; Applicant: Piwokuhle Zitshu; Applicant: Fikelwa Seti; Applicant: Noxolo Maru; Applicant: Nombeko Mazwi; Applicant: Joshua Zwelobusi Jita; Applicant: Lomex Mzanele Sisilana; Applicant: Nomthandazo Ntozakhe; Applicant: Thulisa Sonjani; Applicant: Anita Modikoe; Applicant: Andile Mini; Applicant: Nosiphiwo Somdyala; Applicant: Siyabonga Stompi; Respondent: Public Service Commission; Respondent: MEC: Department of Transport; Respondent: Premier: Eastern Cape; Respondent: Speaker: Eastern Cape Legislature
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2022
- Case Number
- 3703/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Postponement and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Application for postponement granted; costs of postponement awarded against applicants on attorney-and-client scale.
- Judges
- Bands
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Validity, Costs Postponement, Attorney and Client Scale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sonwabo Cibi
Applicant
Piwokuhle Zitshu
Applicant
Fikelwa Seti
Applicant
Noxolo Maru
Applicant
Nombeko Mazwi
Applicant
Joshua Zwelobusi Jita
Applicant
Lomex Mzanele Sisilana
Applicant
Nomthandazo Ntozakhe
Applicant
Thulisa Sonjani
Applicant
Anita Modikoe
Applicant
Andile Mini
Applicant
Nosiphiwo Somdyala
Applicant
Siyabonga Stompi
Applicant
Public Service Commission
Respondent
MEC: Department of Transport
Respondent
Premier: Eastern Cape
Respondent
Speaker: Eastern Cape Legislature
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Postponement and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affidavit submitted by the applicants' attorney is valid despite a gender pronoun error in the attestation clause.
- 2 What scale of costs should be awarded for the postponement caused by the applicants' late engagement of legal representation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the error in the attestation clause of the affidavit, referring to the deponent as 'he' instead of 'she', was a clerical oversight and did not invalidate the affidavit. The deponent was an attorney of the court, and there was no evidence that the affidavit was not properly commissioned. The court applied the principle that substantial compliance with the Regulations suffices and exercised its discretion to admit the affidavit. Regarding costs, the court held that the applicants had been dilatory in pursuing the matter, failing to secure legal representation for nearly a year and providing inadequate explanation for their delays. The applicants' conduct warranted...
Court Disposition
Application for postponement granted; costs of postponement awarded against applicants on attorney-and-client scale.
Orders
- The applicants are jointly and severally ordered to pay the first respondent's costs occasioned by the postponement, on the scale as between attorney and client.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment