Cikolo v S (CA55/2023) [2024] ZAECMKHC 21 (14 February 2024)
The full court lacks jurisdiction to hear a further appeal against the decision of a single judge of the High Court refusing bail, as such further appeals are not regulated by the Criminal Procedure Act but by the Superior Courts Act. Section 16(1)(b) of the Superior Courts Act applies, requiring special leave from the Supreme Court of Appeal for such an appeal to proceed. The appellant's reliance on sections 65 and 65A of the Criminal Procedure Act is misplaced, as these provisions do not regulate further appeals from the High Court. The Supreme Court of Appeal's decision in S v Van Wyk and Another confirms that further appeals in bail matters must follow the procedure set out in the...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAECMKHC 21
- Parties
- Appellant: Bongani Cikolo; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2024
- Case Number
- CA55/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Full Court Appeal Against Single Judge's Refusal of Bail Appeal
- Outcome
- The appeal is struck from the roll for lack of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- Govindjee, ZM Nhlangulela, NW Gqamana
- Legal Topics
- Bail Appeal, Jurisdiction of Full Court, Superior Courts Act, Criminal Procedure Act, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bongani Cikolo
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Full Court Appeal Against Single Judge's Refusal of Bail Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a full court have jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the decision of a single judge to refuse a bail appeal?
- 2 Is a further appeal in bail matters regulated by the Criminal Procedure Act or the Superior Courts Act?
- 3 Does section 16(1)(b) of the Superior Courts Act apply to further bail appeals from the High Court?
Ratio Decidendi
The full court lacks jurisdiction to hear a further appeal against the decision of a single judge of the High Court refusing bail, as such further appeals are not regulated by the Criminal Procedure Act but by the Superior Courts Act. Section 16(1)(b) of the Superior Courts Act applies, requiring special leave from the Supreme Court of Appeal for such an appeal to proceed. The appellant's reliance on sections 65 and 65A of the Criminal Procedure Act is misplaced, as these provisions do not regulate further appeals from the High Court. The Supreme Court of Appeal's decision in S v Van Wyk and Another confirms that further appeals in bail matters must follow the procedure set out in the...
Court Disposition
The appeal is struck from the roll for lack of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The matter is struck from the roll.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment