City of Tshwane v Van Der Merwe (64082/13) [2016] ZAGPPHC 597 (12 July 2016)

City of Tshwane v Van Der Merwe (64082/13) [2016] ZAGPPHC 597 (12 July 2016)

The court found that the respondent failed to provide a satisfactory and detailed explanation for the delay in filing its answering affidavit and condonation application. The respondent ignored repeated correspondence and undertakings to file, only responding after the matter was set down for hearing. The explanation offered was inadequate, lacking specifics about the documents and reasons for delay. The delay was unreasonable, spanning over seven months, and the applicant suffered prejudice due to repeated removals from the roll and lack of finality. However, given the nature of the issues in the main application, the court deemed it appropriate to grant condonation to allow the...

Citation
[2016] ZAGPPHC 597
Parties
Applicant: City of Tshwane; Respondent: Gert Thomas Van Der Merwe
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 July 2016
Case Number
64082/13
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation for Late Filing of Answering Affidavit
Outcome
Condonation for late filing of answering affidavit granted; respondent ordered to pay costs.
Judges
M V Semenya
Legal Topics
Condonation, Late Filing of Affidavit, Civil Contempt, Restoration of Electricity
Civil Procedure Condonation Late Filing of Affidavit Civil Contempt Restoration of Electricity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

City of Tshwane

Applicant

Gert Thomas Van Der Merwe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Condonation Application / Application for Condonation for Late Filing of Answering Affidavit

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the answering affidavit.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's conduct in ignoring correspondence and deadlines justifies refusal of condonation.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant suffered prejudice due to the respondent's delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to provide a satisfactory and detailed explanation for the delay in filing its answering affidavit and condonation application. The respondent ignored repeated correspondence and undertakings to file, only responding after the matter was set down for hearing. The explanation offered was inadequate, lacking specifics about the documents and reasons for delay. The delay was unreasonable, spanning over seven months, and the applicant suffered prejudice due to repeated removals from the roll and lack of finality. However, given the nature of the issues in the main application, the court deemed it appropriate to grant condonation to allow the...

Court Disposition

Condonation for late filing of answering affidavit granted; respondent ordered to pay costs.

Orders

  • The application for condonation of late filing of answering affidavit is granted.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay the costs of this application, including reasonable wasted costs and opposition costs.