Clicks Retailers (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (CCT 07/20) [2021] ZACC 11; 2021 (4) SA 390 (CC); 2021 (10) BCLR 1102 (CC); 84 SATC 71; 2021 BIP 16 (CC) (21 May 2021)
The Constitutional Court held that Clicks is not entitled to claim an allowance under section 24C of the Income Tax Act for its loyalty programme expenditure. The Court found that the contract of sale and the ClubCard contract, while functionally related and inextricably linked within the context of the loyalty programme, do not meet the requirement of contractual 'sameness' as required by section 24C(2). The income accrues under the contract of sale, and the obligation to finance future expenditure arises under the ClubCard contract. Each contract can exist independently: a sale contract does not depend on the ClubCard contract, and vice versa. The Court clarified that mere linkage or...
- Citation
- [2021] ZACC 11
- Parties
- Applicant: Clicks Retailers (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
- Court
- Constitutional Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2021
- Case Number
- CCT 07/20
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of Appeal, After Tax Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted. Costs awarded against applicant.
- Judges
- Mogoeng, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, Mathopo, Mhlantla, Theron, Tshiqi, Victor
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Act, Future Expenditure Allowance, Contractual Sameness, Retail Loyalty Programmes, Deductibility of Expenditure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clicks Retailers (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of Appeal, After Tax Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clicks Retailers (Pty) Ltd is entitled to claim an allowance under section 24C of the Income Tax Act for future expenditure incurred in its loyalty programme.
- 2 Whether the income-producing contract and the obligation-imposing contract are the same or sufficiently inextricably linked to satisfy section 24C(2).
- 3 Whether the contracts underlying the loyalty programme meet the 'sameness' requirement established in Big G.
Ratio Decidendi
The Constitutional Court held that Clicks is not entitled to claim an allowance under section 24C of the Income Tax Act for its loyalty programme expenditure. The Court found that the contract of sale and the ClubCard contract, while functionally related and inextricably linked within the context of the loyalty programme, do not meet the requirement of contractual 'sameness' as required by section 24C(2). The income accrues under the contract of sale, and the obligation to finance future expenditure arises under the ClubCard contract. Each contract can exist independently: a sale contract does not depend on the ClubCard contract, and vice versa. The Court clarified that mere linkage or...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted. Costs awarded against applicant.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment