Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd v Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd (44/LM/May09) [2009] ZACT 54 (2 September 2009)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as neither PIH nor Investec have any interest in firms involved in the manufacture of PET packaging. Consequently, the transaction is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market. Furthermore, the transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger.

Court disposition

Merger approved without conditions.

Orders

  • The acquisition by Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd of Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd is approved.
  • No conditions are attached to the approval.

02

Material facts

Parties

Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc

Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Tribunal Approval of Merger

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The acquiring firms argued that there is no overlap in their activities with the target firm, as neither PIH nor Investec have interests in the manufacture of PET packaging. They submitted that the transaction is an attractive investment opportunity and that the acquisition would not negatively affect competition.
Respondent
The target firm submitted that Chesapeake, a controlling shareholder, has declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy and agreed to sell the Boxmore Group as part of its recovery plan. No arguments were advanced suggesting any competition or public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998

    A merger will not be prohibited unless it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998

    The Tribunal must consider public interest factors in evaluating mergers.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as neither PIH nor Investec have any interest in firms involved in the manufacture of PET packaging. Consequently, the transaction is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market. Furthermore, the transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger.

Obiter and limits

  • The transaction represents an attractive opportunity for PIH to expand its investment portfolio.
  • The sale of the Boxmore Group is part of Chesapeake's recovery plan following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Court disposition

Merger approved without conditions.

  • The acquisition by Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd of Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd is approved.
  • No conditions are attached to the approval.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2009] ZACT 54

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 44/LM/May09

In the matter between:

Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firm

and

Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd Target Firm

Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member), U Bhoola (Tribunal

Member) and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 21 July 2009

Order issued on : 21 July 2009

Reasons issued on : 02 September 2009

Reasons for Decision

Introduction

On 21 July 2009 the Tribunal approved the acquisition by Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd of Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd. The reasons follow below.

Parties

[2] The primary acquiring firm is Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd (“Holdco”), a company registered under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Holdco is controlled by Pamodzi Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“PIH”), which controls firms in excess of 10 in South Africa.

[3] According to the merging parties, Holdco will hold 75% of the issued share capital of a shelf company, Clidet No 906 (Pty) Ltd (“Newco”). The remaining shares will be held by Investec Bank Ltd (15%) and Management (10%). The parties further submit that Newco will be jointly controlled by Holdco and Investec due to certain minority protections on Investec’s 15% shareholding in Newco. Investec is therefore the second primary acquiring firm (as a result of its 15% shareholding and minority protections). No single shareholder controls Investec and it has in excess of 20 subsidiaries in South Africa.

[4] The primary target firm is Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd (“Boxmore Plastics”). Boxmore Plastics is jointly controlled by Boxmore International Ltd (“Boxmore”), a company registered under the laws of the United States of America, Chesapeake UK Acquisitions Ltd and Chesapeake Ltd, both registered under the laws of the United Kingdom. Boxmore Plastics controls Boxmore Cape (Pty) Ltd (“BC”) and Boxmore Plastics Mauritius Ltd (“BPM”).

Parties’ Activities

[5] PIH is an investment holding company with interests in various sectors including food and beverages, information technology, industrial manufacturing, financial services, mining/resources, automotive and leisure industries. Investec is an international, specialist banking group that provides investment banking, treasury and specialised finance, private client activities and asset management.

[6] Boxmore Plastics is involved in the production and supply of polyethylene terephthalate packaging (“PET”) containers and pre-forms. Its major customers are Coca Cola Canners, Coca Cola SABCO, Valaque (SAB) and Shoreline Beverages.

The transaction

[7] The merging parties submit that this transaction will take place in a series of steps. The following are the steps relevant for purposes of evaluating the transaction:

Holdco’s acquisition of 100% of the issued share capital in Boxmore Plastics;

Newco’s acquisition of the businesses of Boxmore Plastics and Boxmore Cape as going concerns and

Newco’s acquisition of all shares in Boxmore Plastics (Mauritius) from Boxmore Plastics.

Rationale

[8] PIH submits that this transaction represents an attractive opportunity to expand its investment portfolio. The target firm submits that Chesapeake has declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy and has agreed to sell the Boxmore Group as part of its recovery plan.

Competition Analysis

[9] There is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties as PIH and Investec do not have any interest in any firm involved in the manufacture of PET packaging. This transaction is therefore unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market.

Public Interest

[10] The transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns.

_______ 02 September 2009

Y Carrim Date

U Bhoola and M Mokuena concurring.

Tribunal Researcher : I Selaledi

For the merging parties : Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc

For the Commission : K Mahlakoana

3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.