Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd v Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd (44/LM/May09) [2009] ZACT 54 (2 September 2009)
- Citation
- [2009] ZACT 54
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, U Bhoola, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 44/LM/May09
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, U Bhoola, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 44/LM/May09
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as neither PIH nor Investec have any interest in firms involved in the manufacture of PET packaging. Consequently, the transaction is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market. Furthermore, the transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger.
Court disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
Orders
- The acquisition by Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd of Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd is approved.
- No conditions are attached to the approval.
02
Material facts
Parties
Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr IncBoxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Control / Tribunal Approval of Merger
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed acquisition would result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any significant public interest concerns.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The acquiring firms argued that there is no overlap in their activities with the target firm, as neither PIH nor Investec have interests in the manufacture of PET packaging. They submitted that the transaction is an attractive investment opportunity and that the acquisition would not negatively affect competition.
- Respondent
- The target firm submitted that Chesapeake, a controlling shareholder, has declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy and agreed to sell the Boxmore Group as part of its recovery plan. No arguments were advanced suggesting any competition or public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
A merger will not be prohibited unless it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 02
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
The Tribunal must consider public interest factors in evaluating mergers.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that there is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties, as neither PIH nor Investec have any interest in firms involved in the manufacture of PET packaging. Consequently, the transaction is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market. Furthermore, the transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns. The Tribunal therefore approved the merger.
Obiter and limits
- The transaction represents an attractive opportunity for PIH to expand its investment portfolio.
- The sale of the Boxmore Group is part of Chesapeake's recovery plan following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Court disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
- The acquisition by Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd of Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd is approved.
- No conditions are attached to the approval.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 44/LM/May09
In the matter between:
Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firm
and
Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd Target Firm
Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member), U Bhoola (Tribunal
Member) and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 21 July 2009
Order issued on : 21 July 2009
Reasons issued on : 02 September 2009
Reasons for Decision
Introduction
On 21 July 2009 the Tribunal approved the acquisition by Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd of Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd. The reasons follow below.
Parties
[2] The primary acquiring firm is Clidet No 907 (Pty) Ltd (âHoldcoâ), a company registered under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Holdco is controlled by Pamodzi Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (âPIHâ), which controls firms in excess of 10 in South Africa.
[3] According to the merging parties, Holdco will hold 75% of the issued share capital of a shelf company, Clidet No 906 (Pty) Ltd (âNewcoâ). The remaining shares will be held by Investec Bank Ltd (15%) and Management (10%). The parties further submit that Newco will be jointly controlled by Holdco and Investec due to certain minority protections on Investecâs 15% shareholding in Newco. Investec is therefore the second primary acquiring firm (as a result of its 15% shareholding and minority protections). No single shareholder controls Investec and it has in excess of 20 subsidiaries in South Africa.
[4] The primary target firm is Boxmore Plastics International (Pty) Ltd (âBoxmore Plasticsâ). Boxmore Plastics is jointly controlled by Boxmore International Ltd (âBoxmoreâ), a company registered under the laws of the United States of America, Chesapeake UK Acquisitions Ltd and Chesapeake Ltd, both registered under the laws of the United Kingdom. Boxmore Plastics controls Boxmore Cape (Pty) Ltd (âBCâ) and Boxmore Plastics Mauritius Ltd (âBPMâ).
Partiesâ Activities
[5] PIH is an investment holding company with interests in various sectors including food and beverages, information technology, industrial manufacturing, financial services, mining/resources, automotive and leisure industries. Investec is an international, specialist banking group that provides investment banking, treasury and specialised finance, private client activities and asset management.
[6] Boxmore Plastics is involved in the production and supply of polyethylene terephthalate packaging (âPETâ) containers and pre-forms. Its major customers are Coca Cola Canners, Coca Cola SABCO, Valaque (SAB) and Shoreline Beverages.
The transaction
[7] The merging parties submit that this transaction will take place in a series of steps. The following are the steps relevant for purposes of evaluating the transaction:
Holdcoâs acquisition of 100% of the issued share capital in Boxmore Plastics;
Newcoâs acquisition of the businesses of Boxmore Plastics and Boxmore Cape as going concerns and
Newcoâs acquisition of all shares in Boxmore Plastics (Mauritius) from Boxmore Plastics.
Rationale
[8] PIH submits that this transaction represents an attractive opportunity to expand its investment portfolio. The target firm submits that Chesapeake has declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy and has agreed to sell the Boxmore Group as part of its recovery plan.
Competition Analysis
[9] There is no overlap in the activities of the merging parties as PIH and Investec do not have any interest in any firm involved in the manufacture of PET packaging. This transaction is therefore unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market.
Public Interest
[10] The transaction does not raise any significant public interest concerns.
_______ 02 September 2009
Y Carrim Date
U Bhoola and M Mokuena concurring.
Tribunal Researcher : I Selaledi
For the merging parties : Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc
For the Commission : K Mahlakoana
3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.