CNA Operations (Pty) Ltd and Others v Anglowealth Sharia (Pty) Ltd and Others (48357 / 2021) [2021] ZAGPJHC 767 (2 December 2021)
The court found that the rescission judgment was not appealable because it lacked finality and merely restored the parties to their positions prior to the perfection order. The Zweni test remains authoritative, and recent cases confirm that rescission orders do not dispose of the main issues and are not final in effect. Anglowealth failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or irreparable harm, as it could still bring a fresh application to perfect its security. The application for leave to appeal and the section 18 application were both dismissed, and costs were awarded against Anglowealth.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 767
- Parties
- Applicant: CNA Operations (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Stephanus Marthinus Johannes Steyn N.O; Applicant: Dallie van der Merwe N.O; Applicant: South African Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers Union; Applicant: Johannes Christiaan Botha; Applicant: Redefine Properties Ltd; Respondent: Anglowealth Sharia (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tashya Giyapersad, N.O; Respondent: Simi Maharaj, N.O; Respondent: Dr Kenneth Moodley, N.O; Respondent: Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2021
- Case Number
- 48357 / 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Section 18 Application Following Rescission Order
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal and section 18 application dismissed; costs awarded against Anglowealth.
- Judges
- N Manoim
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Business Rescue, Rescission of Judgment, Perfection of Security, Affected Persons, Interlocutory Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CNA Operations (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Stephanus Marthinus Johannes Steyn N.O
Applicant
Dallie van der Merwe N.O
Applicant
South African Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers Union
Applicant
Johannes Christiaan Botha
Applicant
Redefine Properties Ltd
Applicant
Anglowealth Sharia (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Tashya Giyapersad, N.O
Respondent
Simi Maharaj, N.O
Respondent
Dr Kenneth Moodley, N.O
Respondent
Companies and Intellectual Property Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Section 18 Application Following Rescission Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the rescission judgment appealable under South African law.
- 2 Does the application for leave to appeal suspend the operation and execution of the rescission order under section 18 of the Superior Courts Act.
- 3 Are the parties in question 'affected persons' for purposes of Rule 42(1)(a) and the Companies Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the rescission judgment was not appealable because it lacked finality and merely restored the parties to their positions prior to the perfection order. The Zweni test remains authoritative, and recent cases confirm that rescission orders do not dispose of the main issues and are not final in effect. Anglowealth failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or irreparable harm, as it could still bring a fresh application to perfect its security. The application for leave to appeal and the section 18 application were both dismissed, and costs were awarded against Anglowealth.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal and section 18 application dismissed; costs awarded against Anglowealth.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The application for a declaratory order in terms of section 18(1), alternatively 18(2) of the Superior Courts Act is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment