Coetzer and Other v Pegasus Industrial Services (Pty) Ltd (JS766/2020) [2021] ZALCJHB 248 (16 August 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 248
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- I.I. Mahomed
- Case number
- JS766/2020
More details
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Panel
- I.I. Mahomed
- Case number
- JS766/2020
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the delay in filing the Statement of Case was only nine days and that the explanation provided by the applicants was satisfactory. The prospects of success in the main dispute were noted, and the respondent did not oppose the application. The court determined that no prejudice would be suffered by the respondent if condonation was granted. Accordingly, condonation for the late filing was granted, and the matter was directed to be enrolled for default judgment.
Court disposition
Condonation for the late filing of the Statement of Case is granted.
Orders
- The late filing of the Applicants Statement of Case is condoned.
- There is no order for costs in the condonation application.
- The Registrar is directed to enroll the matter for default judgment.
- The attorneys for the Applicant are to serve a copy of this judgment and order on the Respondent by no later than a month after receipt of the order.
02
Material facts
Parties
Charien Coetzer and Other
Applicant Counsel: Adv StrobelPegasus Industrial Services (Pty) Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Statement of Case
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the late filing of the Statement of Case by the applicants should be condoned.
- 02
Whether the delay was minimal and satisfactorily explained.
- 03
Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if condonation is granted.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants submitted that the delay in filing the Statement of Case was nine days, which is minimal. They provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay and argued that there are prospects of success in the main dispute. They further contended that the respondent would not suffer any prejudice if condonation is granted.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not appear and did not oppose the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Melane v Santam Insurance Co. Ltd 1962 (4) SA 531 (A)
Condonation for late filing may be granted where the delay is minimal, the explanation is satisfactory, prospects of success exist, and no prejudice is caused to the respondent.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the delay in filing the Statement of Case was only nine days and that the explanation provided by the applicants was satisfactory. The prospects of success in the main dispute were noted, and the respondent did not oppose the application. The court determined that no prejudice would be suffered by the respondent if condonation was granted. Accordingly, condonation for the late filing was granted, and the matter was directed to be enrolled for default judgment.
Obiter and limits
- The applicant's attorneys have diligently indexed and paginated the court file for default judgment and Counsel has already drawn heads in such application.
- The default judgment application was not enrolled before the court and must be held over for another day.
Court disposition
Condonation for the late filing of the Statement of Case is granted.
- The late filing of the Applicants Statement of Case is condoned.
- There is no order for costs in the condonation application.
- The Registrar is directed to enroll the matter for default judgment.
- The attorneys for the Applicant are to serve a copy of this judgment and order on the Respondent by no later than a month after receipt of the order.
Source and reliance status
Labour Court Johannesburg
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Labour Court Johannesburg
Judgment
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
Not Reportable
Revised
Case No: JS766/2020
16/08/21
In the matter between:
CHARIEN
COETZER AND OTHER Applicants
and
PEGASUS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES (Pty) Ltd Respondent
Heard: 07 July 2020
Delivered: (ln view of the measures implemented as a result of the Covid-19 outbreak, this judgment was handed down electronically by circulation
to the parties' representatives by email. The date for hand-down is deemed to be 16 August 2021)
JUDGMENT
MAHOMED, AJ
1. This is an unopposed application to condone the late filing of the Statement of Case (in the Labour Court). The application is filed under section 191(11)(b) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
2. The application was considered in Chambers as the applicants did not require an oral hearing in line with the COVID-19 Directives.
3. I have considered the application deposed to by the first applicant. The delay in approaching this court is nine (9) days. This is a minimal delay and the explanation for delay is satisfactory. There appears to be prospects of success in the main dispute (which I mention also does not appear to be defended). No prejudice would be suffered by the respondent in the granting of condonation. I am thus prepared to grant the applicants condonation.[1]
4. The matter enrolled for hearing on the 7 July 2021 motion roll was the determination of the condonation application only. I make this point, as I note that the applicant's attorneys have diligently indexed and paginated the court file for default judgment and that Counsel has already drawn heads in such application.
5. Whilst I have condoned the late filing of the Statement of Case, as the default judgment was not enrolled before me for hearing such application could not be determined. It must be held over for another day.
6. I thus make the following order:
Order:
1. The late filing of the Applicants Statement of Case is condoned.
2. There is no order for costs in the condonation application.
3. The Registrar is directed to enroll the matter for default judgment.
4 The attorneys for the Applicant are to serve a copy of this judgement and order on the Respondent by no later than a month after receipt of the order.
I.I. Mahomed
Acting Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
Appearances:
For the applicant: J Adv Strobel
Instructed by: Gibbs
& De Jager Attorneys
For the respondent: No Appearance
[1] Melane v Santam Insurance Co. Ltd 1962 (4) SA 531 (A) and various authorities following this judgement
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.