Coin Security Group (Pty) Ltd v SA National Union for Security Officers and Others (223/98) [2000] ZASCA 48; 2001 (2) SA 872 (SCA) (29 September 2000)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appeal had no practical effect or result within the meaning of section 21A of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959. The underlying labour dispute had been resolved by the dismissal of the respondents and subsequent confirmation of the fairness of those dismissals by the Labour Appeal Court. The appellant conceded that the order sought would no longer have any practical effect between the parties. The court reaffirmed the principle that courts do not decide abstract or hypothetical questions and that only orders with practical consequences are appealable. The discretion conferred by section 21A was exercised to dismiss the appeal, as any judgment or...
- Citation
- [2000] ZASCA 48
- Parties
- Appellant: Coin Security Group (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: SA National Union for Security Officers and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2000
- Case Number
- 223/98
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in terms of section 21A of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959; costs awarded against the appellant.
- Judges
- F H Grosskopf, Olivier, Scott, Plewman, Farlam
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of High Court, Exclusive Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Practical Effect of Appeal, Strike Action, Interdicts in Labour Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coin Security Group (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
SA National Union for Security Officers and Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal and any order made thereon would have any practical effect or result within the meaning of section 21A of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959.
- 2 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to grant an interdict in the context of a labour dispute, given the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labour Court under the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995.
- 3 Whether the matter was moot due to the resolution of the underlying labour dispute and the dismissal of the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the appeal had no practical effect or result within the meaning of section 21A of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959. The underlying labour dispute had been resolved by the dismissal of the respondents and subsequent confirmation of the fairness of those dismissals by the Labour Appeal Court. The appellant conceded that the order sought would no longer have any practical effect between the parties. The court reaffirmed the principle that courts do not decide abstract or hypothetical questions and that only orders with practical consequences are appealable. The discretion conferred by section 21A was exercised to dismiss the appeal, as any judgment or...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in terms of section 21A of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959; costs awarded against the appellant.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed in terms of section 21A of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959.
- The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment