Coin Security (Pty) Limited v Comission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR2130/02) [2005] ZALC 70; (2005) 26 ILJ 849 (LC); [2005] 7 BLLR 672 (LC) (26 April 2005)
The Labour Court held that the commissioner properly applied her mind to the relevant facts and law in determining that the applicant's assets-in-transit division is engaged in the transportation of goods for hire or reward by road, and therefore falls within the Road Freight Industry for purposes of bargaining council jurisdiction. The applicant's arguments regarding the definition of 'goods', the ancillary nature of transportation, and the alleged imposition of an onus were either not properly raised before the commissioner or were factually and legally unsound. The review application was brought within a reasonable period under section 158(1)(g) of the Labour Relations Act, and...
- Citation
- [2005] ZALC 70
- Parties
- Applicant: Coin Security (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Kate Savage N.O.; Respondent: Transport & General Workers Union; Respondent: National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight Industry; Respondent: Fidelity Cash Management Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: National Economic Development & Labour Council
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2005
- Case Number
- JR2130/02
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Demarcation Award
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Francis
- Legal Topics
- Demarcation Dispute, Collective Bargaining, Jurisdiction of Bargaining Council, Ancillary Business Operations, Review of Arbitration Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coin Security (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Kate Savage N.O.
Respondent
Transport & General Workers Union
Respondent
National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight Industry
Respondent
Fidelity Cash Management Services (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
National Economic Development & Labour Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Demarcation Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's assets-in-transit division falls within the Road Freight Industry for purposes of bargaining council jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the commissioner committed reviewable errors of law or fact in the demarcation award.
- 3 Whether the review application was brought within a reasonable period and whether condonation was required.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court held that the commissioner properly applied her mind to the relevant facts and law in determining that the applicant's assets-in-transit division is engaged in the transportation of goods for hire or reward by road, and therefore falls within the Road Freight Industry for purposes of bargaining council jurisdiction. The applicant's arguments regarding the definition of 'goods', the ancillary nature of transportation, and the alleged imposition of an onus were either not properly raised before the commissioner or were factually and legally unsound. The review application was brought within a reasonable period under section 158(1)(g) of the Labour Relations Act, and...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel for the third and fourth respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment