Colett v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation And Arbitration and Others (P293/2009, PA7/12) [2014] ZALAC 1; [2014] 6 BLLR 523 (LAC); (2014) 35 ILJ 1948 (LAC) (13 February 2014)

Colett v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation And Arbitration and Others (P293/2009, PA7/12) [2014] ZALAC 1; [2014] 6 BLLR 523 (LAC); (2014) 35 ILJ 1948 (LAC) (13 February 2014)

The Labour Appeal Court found that the appellant's delay in prosecuting the review application was unreasonable and his explanation for the delay was unsatisfactory and unacceptable. The appellant ignored multiple directives from the Registrar and failed to provide any credible reason for his inaction, including not approaching Legal Aid South Africa timeously and failing to act after recovering from his alleged medical condition. The copying of paragraphs from an unrelated case into the Labour Court's judgment was a technological error that did not affect the reasoning or outcome. The Labour Court exercised its discretion judicially in refusing condonation without considering prospects...

Citation
[2014] ZALAC 1
Parties
Appellant: Rene Colett; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Comfort Robert Niemand N.O.; Respondent: General Motors (SA) (Pty) Ltd
Court
Labour Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 February 2014
Case Number
P293/2009, PA7/12
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application for Delay
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Tlaletsi, C J Musi, Mokgoatlheng
Legal Topics
Condonation for Late Review, Unreasonable Delay, Labour Court Rules, Prospects of Success, Costs Order
Labour Law Condonation for Late Review Unreasonable Delay Labour Court Rules Prospects of Success Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rene Colett

Appellant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Commissioner Comfort Robert Niemand N.O.

Respondent

General Motors (SA) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application for Delay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Labour Court erred in refusing condonation for the late prosecution of the review application.
  2. 2 Whether the explanation for the delay was satisfactory and acceptable.
  3. 3 Whether the Labour Court was obliged to consider prospects of success despite a poor explanation for delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Appeal Court found that the appellant's delay in prosecuting the review application was unreasonable and his explanation for the delay was unsatisfactory and unacceptable. The appellant ignored multiple directives from the Registrar and failed to provide any credible reason for his inaction, including not approaching Legal Aid South Africa timeously and failing to act after recovering from his alleged medical condition. The copying of paragraphs from an unrelated case into the Labour Court's judgment was a technological error that did not affect the reasoning or outcome. The Labour Court exercised its discretion judicially in refusing condonation without considering prospects...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.