Colgate-Palmolive (Pty) Ltd v Rala-Rala and Others (JR79/19) [2021] ZALCJHB 35 (20 January 2021)
The court held that section 187(1)(c) of the LRA, as amended, is intended to protect collective bargaining and does not apply to individual dismissals. The first respondent was dismissed for misconduct following a disciplinary hearing, and the NBCCI has jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute under section 191(5) of the LRA. The applicant's reliance on section 187(1)(c) was misplaced and constituted a strategy to delay the proceedings. The arbitrator correctly identified the real nature of the dispute, and there was no just and equitable reason for the Labour Court to entertain a review of the jurisdictional ruling prior to final determination. The review application was found to be...
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 35
- Parties
- Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Thamsanqa Andile Rala-Rala; Respondent: National Bargaining Council for the Chemical Industry; Respondent: Nozibusiso Faith Gumede N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2021
- Case Number
- JR79/19
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Jurisdictional Review of Arbitration Ruling Prior to Final Determination of Unfair Dismissal Dispute.
- Outcome
- Review application dismissed with punitive costs awarded against the applicant.
- Judges
- P Nkutha-Nkontwana
- Legal Topics
- Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Bargaining Council, Section 187 1 C Lra, Section 158 1b Lra, Unfair Dismissal for Misconduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colgate-Palmolive (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Thamsanqa Andile Rala-Rala
Respondent
National Bargaining Council for the Chemical Industry
Respondent
Nozibusiso Faith Gumede N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Jurisdictional Review of Arbitration Ruling Prior to Final Determination of Unfair Dismissal Dispute.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the National Bargaining Council for the Chemical Industry has jurisdiction to arbitrate the unfair dismissal dispute.
- 2 Whether the applicant's dismissal of the first respondent constitutes an automatically unfair dismissal under section 187(1)(c) of the LRA.
- 3 Whether it is just and equitable for the Labour Court to entertain a review of the jurisdictional ruling prior to final determination of the dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 187(1)(c) of the LRA, as amended, is intended to protect collective bargaining and does not apply to individual dismissals. The first respondent was dismissed for misconduct following a disciplinary hearing, and the NBCCI has jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute under section 191(5) of the LRA. The applicant's reliance on section 187(1)(c) was misplaced and constituted a strategy to delay the proceedings. The arbitrator correctly identified the real nature of the dispute, and there was no just and equitable reason for the Labour Court to entertain a review of the jurisdictional ruling prior to final determination. The review application was found to be...
Court Disposition
Review application dismissed with punitive costs awarded against the applicant.
Orders
- The review application is dismissed.
- The third respondent, NBCCI, is directed to urgently set down the pending arbitration proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment