Combo v Minister of Police (5904/2018) [2024] ZAECMHC 33 (11 June 2024)
The court found that the plaintiff was shot by members of the defendant on 24 April 2018, sustaining a rubber bullet wound to the thigh. The plaintiff's identification of the police was credible and unchallenged by contrary evidence. The defendant's reliance on the absence of an occurrence book entry and the presence of other law enforcement agencies did not rebut the plaintiff's case. The medical evidence supported the plaintiff's account of injury. However, the plaintiff failed to prove loss of income for four months or future earning capacity, as no documentary evidence or explanation was provided. The amounts claimed for general damages and loss of earning capacity were found to be...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAECMHC 33
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Siyambonga Combo; Defendant: Minister of Police
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2024
- Case Number
- 5904/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial on Merits and Quantum
- Outcome
- Plaintiff partially succeeds; awarded general damages only.
- Judges
- M Makaula
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Police Conduct, Personal Injury, Quantification of General Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siyambonga Combo
Plaintiff
Minister of Police
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial on Merits and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was unlawfully and wrongfully shot by members of the defendant.
- 2 Whether the defendant is liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff proved loss of income and future earning capacity as claimed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff was shot by members of the defendant on 24 April 2018, sustaining a rubber bullet wound to the thigh. The plaintiff's identification of the police was credible and unchallenged by contrary evidence. The defendant's reliance on the absence of an occurrence book entry and the presence of other law enforcement agencies did not rebut the plaintiff's case. The medical evidence supported the plaintiff's account of injury. However, the plaintiff failed to prove loss of income for four months or future earning capacity, as no documentary evidence or explanation was provided. The amounts claimed for general damages and loss of earning capacity were found to be...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff partially succeeds; awarded general damages only.
Orders
- The defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff an amount of R50,000.00 for pain and suffering.
- Costs of suit are awarded at the Magistrates' court scale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment