Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Langa National Brickworks (Pty) Ltd. (454/89) [1991] ZASCA 86 (22 August 1991)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the application for a declaratory order should not have been decided on motion proceedings due to bona fide disputes of material fact regarding the authority of depot staff, the locus of contract formation, and the nature of LNB's enterprise in South Africa. The affidavits presented conflicting versions, and credibility could not be assessed without oral evidence. The court found that the confirmation of order forms issued by depot staff were, objectively, capable of constituting acceptance of orders and thus contract formation in South Africa. The court rejected the respondent's argument that the price was uncertain or at the sole discretion of LNB,...
- Citation
- [1991] ZASCA 86
- Parties
- Appellant: Commissioner for Inland Revenue; Respondent: Langa National Brickworks (Proprietary) Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 1991
- Case Number
- 454/89
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Declaratory Order Granted by the Durban and Coast Local Division
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; declaratory order set aside; application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Hoexter, Nestadt, Milne, Eksteen, Goldstone
- Legal Topics
- Sales Tax Assessment, Declaratory Relief, Disputes of Fact in Motion Proceedings, Contract Formation, Jurisdiction of Tax Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner for Inland Revenue
Appellant
Langa National Brickworks (Proprietary) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Declaratory Order Granted by the Durban and Coast Local Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the declaratory order regarding exemption from sales tax was properly granted on motion proceedings despite material disputes of fact.
- 2 Whether bulk sales by LNB to South African customers were concluded in Swaziland or at the Durban depot, affecting sales tax liability.
- 3 Whether the staff at the Durban depot had authority to accept bulk orders on behalf of LNB, thereby concluding contracts in South Africa.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the application for a declaratory order should not have been decided on motion proceedings due to bona fide disputes of material fact regarding the authority of depot staff, the locus of contract formation, and the nature of LNB's enterprise in South Africa. The affidavits presented conflicting versions, and credibility could not be assessed without oral evidence. The court found that the confirmation of order forms issued by depot staff were, objectively, capable of constituting acceptance of orders and thus contract formation in South Africa. The court rejected the respondent's argument that the price was uncertain or at the sole discretion of LNB,...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; declaratory order set aside; application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The late filing of the appellant's notice of appeal is condoned.
- The appeal succeeds with costs, including costs consequent upon the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment