Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Langa National Brickworks (Pty) Ltd. (454/89) [1991] ZASCA 86 (22 August 1991)

Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Langa National Brickworks (Pty) Ltd. (454/89) [1991] ZASCA 86 (22 August 1991)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the application for a declaratory order should not have been decided on motion proceedings due to bona fide disputes of material fact regarding the authority of depot staff, the locus of contract formation, and the nature of LNB's enterprise in South Africa. The affidavits presented conflicting versions, and credibility could not be assessed without oral evidence. The court found that the confirmation of order forms issued by depot staff were, objectively, capable of constituting acceptance of orders and thus contract formation in South Africa. The court rejected the respondent's argument that the price was uncertain or at the sole discretion of LNB,...

Citation
[1991] ZASCA 86
Parties
Appellant: Commissioner for Inland Revenue; Respondent: Langa National Brickworks (Proprietary) Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 August 1991
Case Number
454/89
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Declaratory Order Granted by the Durban and Coast Local Division
Outcome
Appeal upheld; declaratory order set aside; application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Hoexter, Nestadt, Milne, Eksteen, Goldstone
Legal Topics
Sales Tax Assessment, Declaratory Relief, Disputes of Fact in Motion Proceedings, Contract Formation, Jurisdiction of Tax Courts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner for Inland Revenue

Appellant

Langa National Brickworks (Proprietary) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Declaratory Order Granted by the Durban and Coast Local Division

  1. 1 Whether the declaratory order regarding exemption from sales tax was properly granted on motion proceedings despite material disputes of fact.
  2. 2 Whether bulk sales by LNB to South African customers were concluded in Swaziland or at the Durban depot, affecting sales tax liability.
  3. 3 Whether the staff at the Durban depot had authority to accept bulk orders on behalf of LNB, thereby concluding contracts in South Africa.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the application for a declaratory order should not have been decided on motion proceedings due to bona fide disputes of material fact regarding the authority of depot staff, the locus of contract formation, and the nature of LNB's enterprise in South Africa. The affidavits presented conflicting versions, and credibility could not be assessed without oral evidence. The court found that the confirmation of order forms issued by depot staff were, objectively, capable of constituting acceptance of orders and thus contract formation in South Africa. The court rejected the respondent's argument that the price was uncertain or at the sole discretion of LNB,...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; declaratory order set aside; application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The late filing of the appellant's notice of appeal is condoned.
  • The appeal succeeds with costs, including costs consequent upon the employment of two counsel.