Commissioner for Inland Revenue v NCR Corporation of South Africa (Pty) Ltd. (5/1988) [1988] ZASCA 5 (10 March 1988)
Section 88 of the Income Tax Act only obliges the Commissioner to pay interest on tax refunds where the assessment is altered as a result of a decision by a court of law on appeal or in conformity with such a decision in the taxpayer's own case. The refunds in question did not result from a court decision or appeal judgment, but from extra-judicial concessions and revised assessments by the Commissioner. Therefore, the respondent was not entitled to interest under section 88. The interpretation advanced by the respondent, which would extend the section's application to any revision following authoritative judgments in other cases, is not supported by the wording or legislative intent of...
- Citation
- [1988] ZASCA 5
- Parties
- Appellant: Commissioner for Inland Revenue; Respondent: NCR Corporation of South Africa (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1988
- Case Number
- 5/1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Witwatersrand Local Division, Challenging Declaratory Orders Regarding Interest on Tax Refunds Under Section 88 of the Income Tax Act.
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an order dismissing the application with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Corbett, Viljoen, Smalberger, Vivier, Nicholas
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Act Section 88, Interest on Tax Refunds, Interpretation of Statutes, Declaratory Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner for Inland Revenue
Appellant
NCR Corporation of South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Witwatersrand Local Division, Challenging Declaratory Orders Regarding Interest on Tax Refunds Under Section 88 of the Income Tax Act.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 88 of the Income Tax Act obliges the Commissioner to pay interest on tax refunds where assessments are revised without a court decision or appeal judgment.
- 2 Whether interest on refunded provisional tax should be calculated from the date of receipt or from the date of assessment.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 88 of the Income Tax Act only obliges the Commissioner to pay interest on tax refunds where the assessment is altered as a result of a decision by a court of law on appeal or in conformity with such a decision in the taxpayer's own case. The refunds in question did not result from a court decision or appeal judgment, but from extra-judicial concessions and revised assessments by the Commissioner. Therefore, the respondent was not entitled to interest under section 88. The interpretation advanced by the respondent, which would extend the section's application to any revision following authoritative judgments in other cases, is not supported by the wording or legislative intent of...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an order dismissing the application with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, such costs to include the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment