Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd (431/06) [2007] ZASCA 100; [2007] 4 All SA 1352 (SCA); 2007 (6) SA 545 (SCA); 69 SATC 220 (14 September 2007)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the objective characteristics of the aluminium containers, not their intended use or disposability, determine their tariff classification. The containers are capable of being used more than once and their nature does not preclude re-use as kitchen articles. The tariff heading does not require durability or permanence. The containers fall under tariff heading 76.15 as hollowware for table or kitchen use, as they possess sufficient depth and structure to be classified as hollowware rather than flatware. The explanatory notes and dictionary definitions support this interpretation. The intention of the importer and the environment in which the containers...
- Citation
- [2007] ZASCA 100
- Parties
- Appellant: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service; Respondent: The Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2007
- Case Number
- 431/06
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Cape High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; order of the court below set aside; Commissioner’s tariff determination confirmed.
- Judges
- Scott, Brand, Lewis, Maya, Mhlantla
- Legal Topics
- Customs Tariff Classification, Objective Characteristics, Anti Dumping Duty, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
Appellant
The Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Cape High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether aluminium foil containers imported by The Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd are dutiable as hollowware for table or kitchen use under tariff heading 76.15.
- 2 Whether the intention of the importer or the durability of the containers is relevant to their tariff classification.
- 3 Whether the containers constitute 'hollowware' as contemplated by the tariff heading.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the objective characteristics of the aluminium containers, not their intended use or disposability, determine their tariff classification. The containers are capable of being used more than once and their nature does not preclude re-use as kitchen articles. The tariff heading does not require durability or permanence. The containers fall under tariff heading 76.15 as hollowware for table or kitchen use, as they possess sufficient depth and structure to be classified as hollowware rather than flatware. The explanatory notes and dictionary definitions support this interpretation. The intention of the importer and the environment in which the containers...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; order of the court below set aside; Commissioner’s tariff determination confirmed.
Orders
- The tariff determination of the imported goods under tariff heading 7615.19.20 is confirmed.
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment