Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd (431/06) [2007] ZASCA 100; [2007] 4 All SA 1352 (SCA); 2007 (6) SA 545 (SCA); 69 SATC 220 (14 September 2007)

Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd (431/06) [2007] ZASCA 100; [2007] 4 All SA 1352 (SCA); 2007 (6) SA 545 (SCA); 69 SATC 220 (14 September 2007)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the objective characteristics of the aluminium containers, not their intended use or disposability, determine their tariff classification. The containers are capable of being used more than once and their nature does not preclude re-use as kitchen articles. The tariff heading does not require durability or permanence. The containers fall under tariff heading 76.15 as hollowware for table or kitchen use, as they possess sufficient depth and structure to be classified as hollowware rather than flatware. The explanatory notes and dictionary definitions support this interpretation. The intention of the importer and the environment in which the containers...

Citation
[2007] ZASCA 100
Parties
Appellant: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service; Respondent: The Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 September 2007
Case Number
431/06
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Cape High Court
Outcome
Appeal upheld; order of the court below set aside; Commissioner’s tariff determination confirmed.
Judges
Scott, Brand, Lewis, Maya, Mhlantla
Legal Topics
Customs Tariff Classification, Objective Characteristics, Anti Dumping Duty, Interpretation of Statutes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service

Appellant

The Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Cape High Court

  1. 1 Whether aluminium foil containers imported by The Baking Tin (Pty) Ltd are dutiable as hollowware for table or kitchen use under tariff heading 76.15.
  2. 2 Whether the intention of the importer or the durability of the containers is relevant to their tariff classification.
  3. 3 Whether the containers constitute 'hollowware' as contemplated by the tariff heading.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the objective characteristics of the aluminium containers, not their intended use or disposability, determine their tariff classification. The containers are capable of being used more than once and their nature does not preclude re-use as kitchen articles. The tariff heading does not require durability or permanence. The containers fall under tariff heading 76.15 as hollowware for table or kitchen use, as they possess sufficient depth and structure to be classified as hollowware rather than flatware. The explanatory notes and dictionary definitions support this interpretation. The intention of the importer and the environment in which the containers...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; order of the court below set aside; Commissioner’s tariff determination confirmed.

Orders

  • The tariff determination of the imported goods under tariff heading 7615.19.20 is confirmed.
  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.