Competition Commission of South Africa v Fruit & Veg City Holdings Proprietary Limited and Others; In re: Competition Commission of South Africa v Fruit & Veg Proprietary Limited and Others (FTN131Sep15) [2015] ZACT 109; [2015] 2 CPLR 553 (CT) (7 October 2015)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Fruit & Veg City Holdings Proprietary Limited and Others; In re: Competition Commission of South Africa v Fruit & Veg Proprietary Limited and Others (FTN131Sep15) [2015] ZACT 109; [2015] 2 CPLR 553 (CT) (7 October 2015)

The Tribunal found that the respondents implemented two notifiable intermediate merger transactions—the Everfresh merger and the Gastaldi merger—without prior approval from the Competition Commission, in clear contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. The respondents admitted the contraventions and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] ZACT 109
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission of South Africa; Respondent: Fruit & Veg City Holdings Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Fruit & Veg City SA Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Everfresh Wholesale Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Fruit & Veg City Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Sandro Gastaldi; Respondent: Luciano Gastaldi
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
FTN131Sep15
Procedural Posture
Settlement Confirmation / Order Confirming Settlement Agreement
Outcome
Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Respondents to pay administrative penalty and implement compliance programme.
Judges
N Manoim, I Valodia, M Mokuena
Legal Topics
Prior Implementation of Merger, Administrative Penalty, Merger Notification, Section 13a Competition Act, Settlement Agreement
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Prior Implementation of Merger Administrative Penalty Merger Notification Section 13a Competition Act Settlement Agreement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

Fruit & Veg City Holdings Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Fruit & Veg City SA Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Everfresh Wholesale Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Fruit & Veg City Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Sandro Gastaldi

Respondent

Luciano Gastaldi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Settlement Confirmation / Order Confirming Settlement Agreement

  1. 1 Did the respondents implement notifiable intermediate mergers without prior approval from the Competition Commission, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act?
  2. 2 Are the respondents liable for an administrative penalty for prior implementation of merger transactions?
  3. 3 Should the settlement agreement between the Commission and the respondents be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondents implemented two notifiable intermediate merger transactions—the Everfresh merger and the Gastaldi merger—without prior approval from the Competition Commission, in clear contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. The respondents admitted the contraventions and agreed to pay a joint and several administrative penalty of R750,000, to be paid in twelve monthly instalments. They further undertook to notify future notifiable mergers and to implement a competition law compliance programme. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement adequately addressed the contraventions and confirmed the agreement as an order, thereby...

Court Disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Respondents to pay administrative penalty and implement compliance programme.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and the respondents is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • The respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay an administrative penalty of R750,000 to the Competition Commission, payable in twelve equal monthly instalments.