Competition Commission of South Africa v Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC (CO159Jan22) [2022] ZACT 44; [2022] 1 CPLR 4 (CT) (27 January 2022)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC (CO159Jan22) [2022] ZACT 44; [2022] 1 CPLR 4 (CT) (27 January 2022)

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC as an order. The Commission's investigation established that Mokgatshelwa and Monnye and Khomo Construction CC assisted each other in preparing tender documents, with similarities in pricing and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] ZACT 44
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission of South Africa; Respondent: Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
CO159Jan22
Procedural Posture
Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement as Tribunal Order
Outcome
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty and compliance undertakings imposed.
Judges
AW Wessels, E Daniels, L Mncube
Legal Topics
Collusive Tendering, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Section 4 1 B Iii, Compliance Programme
Competition Law Collusive Tendering Administrative Penalty Consent Agreement Section 4 1 B Iii Compliance Programme

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement as Tribunal Order

  1. 1 Whether Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC contravened section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act by engaging in collusive tendering.
  2. 2 Whether the consent agreement should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal under section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act.
  3. 3 What administrative penalty and compliance measures are appropriate in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC as an order. The Commission's investigation established that Mokgatshelwa and Monnye and Khomo Construction CC assisted each other in preparing tender documents, with similarities in pricing and documentation indicating collusive tendering. Although Mokgatshelwa did not admit liability, the Commission considered the firm's small size, the minor value of the tender, and the absence of prior contraventions as mitigating factors. Mokgatshelwa agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R499,669, implement a competition law compliance programme, and circulate the agreement...

Court Disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty and compliance undertakings imposed.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Mokgatshelwa Projects and Trading CC shall pay an administrative penalty of R499,669 to the Competition Commission within six months in two equal instalments.