Competition Commission of South Africa v Overlooked Colliery Alpha (Pty) Ltd and Another (FTN062Aug21) [2021] ZACT 94 (26 August 2021)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Overlooked Colliery Alpha (Pty) Ltd and Another (FTN062Aug21) [2021] ZACT 94 (26 August 2021)

The Tribunal found that the respondents had implemented a notifiable intermediate merger prior to obtaining approval from the Competition Commission, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. The respondents admitted liability and agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R577,500, to be paid in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] ZACT 94
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission of South Africa; Respondent: Overlooked Colliery Alpha (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sudar Coal (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
FTN062Aug21
Procedural Posture
Consent Order Application / Confirmation of Consent Agreement as Tribunal Order
Outcome
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings concluded.
Judges
E Daniel, Y Carrim, H Cheadle
Legal Topics
Prior Implementation of Merger, Administrative Penalty, Merger Notification, Consent Agreement
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Prior Implementation of Merger Administrative Penalty Merger Notification Consent Agreement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

Overlooked Colliery Alpha (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Sudar Coal (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Consent Order Application / Confirmation of Consent Agreement as Tribunal Order

  1. 1 Did the respondents contravene section 13A(3) of the Competition Act by implementing a notifiable merger prior to approval?
  2. 2 Is the administrative penalty agreed upon appropriate under the Act?
  3. 3 Should the consent agreement be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondents had implemented a notifiable intermediate merger prior to obtaining approval from the Competition Commission, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. The respondents admitted liability and agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R577,500, to be paid in instalments. They further undertook to notify the Commission of any future notifiable mergers and to implement a competition law compliance programme. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement addressed the contravention and provided adequate undertakings and penalty. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all...

Court Disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings concluded.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission, Overlooked Colliery Alpha (Pty) Ltd, and Sudar Coal (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Overlooked Colliery Alpha (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R577,500 to the Competition Commission in accordance with the payment schedule set out in the agreement.