Competition Commission of South Africa v QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd (CO032May22) [2022] ZACT 58 (21 June 2022)

Competition Commission of South Africa v QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd (CO032May22) [2022] ZACT 58 (21 June 2022)

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd. The Commission's investigation established that QQQ Trading and ERB Investments engaged in conduct amounting to collusive tendering, a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) and (iii) of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] ZACT 58
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission of South Africa; Respondent: QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
CO032May22
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
Outcome
Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; compliance and monitoring undertakings accepted.
Judges
Y Carrim, I Valodia, A Ndoni
Legal Topics
Collusive Tendering, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Section 4 1 B Violation
Competition Law Collusive Tendering Administrative Penalty Consent Agreement Section 4 1 B Violation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation

  1. 1 Whether QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) and (iii) of the Competition Act by engaging in collusive tendering with ERB Investments (Pty) Ltd.
  2. 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  3. 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd. The Commission's investigation established that QQQ Trading and ERB Investments engaged in conduct amounting to collusive tendering, a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) and (iii) of the Competition Act. Although QQQ Trading did not admit liability, the Commission considered the firm's small size, first-time offender status, and cooperation in reaching the consent agreement. The agreement includes an administrative penalty of R30,000, compliance undertakings, and monitoring provisions. The Tribunal found the terms of the agreement to be appropriate and in line with the...

Court Disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; compliance and monitoring undertakings accepted.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • QQQ Trading Enterprise (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R30,000 to the Competition Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the agreement.