Competition Commission of South Africa v Standard Chartered Bank (CR212Feb17; SA128Nov23) [2023] ZACT 68; [2024] 1 CPLR 11 (CT) (15 November 2023)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Standard Chartered Bank (CR212Feb17; SA128Nov23) [2023] ZACT 68; [2024] 1 CPLR 11 (CT) (15 November 2023)

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank as an order. The Bank admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing and market allocation in the ZAR foreign exchange market between 2007 and 2013....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] ZACT 68
Parties
Applicant: Competition Commission of South Africa; Respondent: Standard Chartered Bank
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
15 November 2023
Case Number
CR212Feb17; SA128Nov23
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Confirmation of Settlement Agreement
Outcome
Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings for future compliance accepted.
Judges
L Mncube, I Valodia, A Ndoni
Legal Topics
Price Fixing, Market Allocation, Administrative Penalty, Settlement Agreement, Section 4 Competition Act
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Price Fixing Market Allocation Administrative Penalty Settlement Agreement Section 4 Competition Act

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant

Standard Chartered Bank

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Settlement Application / Confirmation of Settlement Agreement

  1. 1 Whether Standard Chartered Bank contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing and market allocation in the foreign exchange market.
  2. 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the Commission and Standard Chartered Bank should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  3. 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate under the Competition Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank as an order. The Bank admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing and market allocation in the ZAR foreign exchange market between 2007 and 2013. The Tribunal found that the settlement agreement was entered into voluntarily, included appropriate undertakings for future compliance, and imposed an administrative penalty that did not exceed the statutory maximum. The Tribunal was satisfied that the agreement resolved all proceedings between the parties regarding the alleged contraventions and that the penalty would be paid...

Court Disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings for future compliance accepted.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall pay an administrative penalty of R42,715,880 to the Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the order.