Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission of South Africa v Standard Chartered Bank (CR212Feb17; SA128Nov23) [2023] ZACT 68; [2024] 1 CPLR 11 (CT) (15 November 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank as an order. The Bank admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing and market allocation in the ZAR foreign exchange market between 2007 and 2013. The Tribunal found that the settlement agreement was entered into voluntarily, included appropriate undertakings for future compliance, and imposed an administrative penalty that did not exceed the statutory maximum. The Tribunal was satisfied that the agreement resolved all proceedings between the parties regarding the alleged contraventions and that the penalty would be paid to the National Revenue Fund as required by law.

Court disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings for future compliance accepted.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall pay an administrative penalty of R42,715,880 to the Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the order.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall implement and submit its competition law compliance programme to the Commission within 90 days.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall circulate a summary of the settlement agreement to relevant employees within 30 days.
  • No further action will be brought by the Commission against Standard Chartered Bank regarding the conduct described in the complaint.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission of South Africa

Applicant Counsel: Doris Tshepe

Standard Chartered Bank

Respondent Counsel: Roberto Hoornweg

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 42,715,880

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Settlement Application / Confirmation of Settlement Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Commission argued that Standard Chartered Bank, along with other banks, engaged in prohibited practices by fixing prices and allocating customers in the foreign exchange market for ZAR currency pairs. The Commission submitted that the conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act. The Commission sought confirmation of the settlement agreement, which included an admission of liability, cooperation undertakings, future compliance measures, and payment of an administrative penalty.
Respondent
Standard Chartered Bank admitted to the contraventions described by the Commission, specifically price fixing and market allocation in the ZAR foreign exchange market between 2007 and 2013. The Bank confirmed cessation of the conduct, agreed to cooperate with the Commission in prosecuting other participants, undertook to implement compliance measures, and accepted the administrative penalty as full and final settlement of all proceedings related to the conduct.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements or concerted practices between competitors involving price fixing, market allocation, or collusive tendering.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Section 49D and section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act empower the Tribunal to confirm settlement agreements as orders where parties admit contraventions and agree on penalties.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Section 59(1)(a) and 59(2)-(4) of the Competition Act provide for the imposition and payment of administrative penalties for prohibited practices.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank as an order. The Bank admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing and market allocation in the ZAR foreign exchange market between 2007 and 2013. The Tribunal found that the settlement agreement was entered into voluntarily, included appropriate undertakings for future compliance, and imposed an administrative penalty that did not exceed the statutory maximum. The Tribunal was satisfied that the agreement resolved all proceedings between the parties regarding the alleged contraventions and that the penalty would be paid to the National Revenue Fund as required by law.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of cooperation by settling parties in the prosecution of other participants in cartel conduct.
  • The Tribunal emphasized the need for robust compliance programmes to prevent future contraventions of competition law.
  • The Tribunal observed that settlement agreements serve the public interest by resolving matters efficiently and ensuring accountability.

Court disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings for future compliance accepted.

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall pay an administrative penalty of R42,715,880 to the Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the order.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall implement and submit its competition law compliance programme to the Commission within 90 days.
  • Standard Chartered Bank shall circulate a summary of the settlement agreement to relevant employees within 30 days.
  • No further action will be brought by the Commission against Standard Chartered Bank regarding the conduct described in the complaint.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2023] ZACT 68

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF

SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CR212Feb17/SA128Nov23

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission of South Africa Applicant

And

Standard Chartered Bank Respondent

Panel : L Mncube (Presiding Member)

: I Valodia (Tribunal Member)

: A Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 15 November 2023

Decided on : 15 November 2023

Settlement Agreement

The Tribunal hereby confirms the settlement agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank annexed hereto.

Presiding Member Prof. Liberty Mncube

Concurring: Prof. Imraan Valodia and Ms Andiswa Ndoni

Date: 15 November 2023

IN THE COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

(HELD IN PRETORIA)

CT Case No: CR212FEB17

CC Case No: 2015Apr0147/

2016Aug0432

In the matter between

COMPETITION

COMMISSION

APPLICANT

and

STANDARD CHARTERED

BANK

RESPONDENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D AS READ WITH SECTION 58(1)(b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, IN RESPECT OF CONTRAVENTIONS OF SECTION 4(1)(b)(i) AND (ii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998, AS AMENDED

The Competition Commission and Standard Chartered Bank hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Settlement Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 49D read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended, in respect of contraventions of section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Act, on the terms set out below.

1.

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this Settlement Agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1. "Act" means the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended;

1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal business address at 3rd Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.3. "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

1.4. "Complaint" means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner in terms of section 49B(1) of the Act under case number: 2015Apr0147 and 2016Aug0432;

1.5. “Parties” means the Commission and Standard Chartered Bank;

1.6. “Respondent” means Standard Chartered Bank;

1.7. "Settlement Agreement" means this Agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Standard Chartered Bank in full and final settlement of Commission case number: 2015Apr0147 and 2016Aug0432;

1.8. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.9. USD and “Dollars” means the lawful currency of the United States of America;

1.10. ZAR means the South African Rand, the lawful currency of the Republic of South Africa.

2. THE COMMISSION'S

INVESTIGATION AND

FINDINGS INTO

THE ALLEGED CONTRAVENTIONS

2.1 On 01 April 2015, the Commissioner initiated a complaint in terms of section 49B(1) of the Act against Barclays Bank Plc, Barclays Africa Group Ltd, BNP Paribas, BNP Paribas South Africa, Citigroup Inc, Citigroup Global Markets (Pty) Ltd, JP Morgan Chase & Co, JP Morgan South Africa, Investec Ltd, Standard New York Securities Inc and Standard Chartered Bank (“the respondents”) .

2.2 The complaint related to allegations that the Respondents entered into an agreement and/ or engaged in a concerted practice to directly or indirectly fix the prices in relation to bids, offers and bid-offer spreads in respect of spot trades, forward trades and future trades involving the ZAR in contravention of Section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act. The complaint was investigated under case number: 2015Apr0147.

2.3 On 31 August 2016, the Commissioner amended the initiation to include ABSA Bank Limited, Barclays Capital Inc, Credit Suisse Group, Commerzbank AG, Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, HSBC Bank Plc, ANZ, Citibank N.A, JP Morgan, Nomura International Plc, Macquarie Bank Limited and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A as additional Respondents and to include the conduct of market allocation by allocating customers against the Respondents. This case was investigated under case number: 2015Apr0147 and 2016Aug0432.

2.4 The amended complaint involved allegations that the Respondents being competitors in the foreign exchange market, in relation to the ZAR, engaged in the exchange of confidential and/or sensitive information with regards to bid offer spreads, forex futures and/or forward spreads, price fixing or fixing of trading conditions and market division by allocating customers in the foreign exchange market in contravention of Section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Act.

2.5 On 15 February 2017, the Commission referred the matter against all the Respondents to the Tribunal for adjudication.

2.6 The Commission's investigation revealed the following:

2.6.1 Between 2007 and 2013, the Respondents' fixed prices of bids, offers and bid-offer spreads in relation to spot trades of ZAR currency pairs through bilateral and multilateral communications using instant messaging platforms and other means of communication.

2.6.2 The Respondents assisted each other through allowing a trader with a large open risk position to complete his trades first before trading and through holding and/or pulling their trades to reverse liquidity for each other instead of trading normally in the market.

2.7 This conduct amounts to price fixing and market allocation in contravention of Section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Act.

3.

ADMISSION OF LIABILITY

3.1. Standard Chartered Bank admits that it engaged in the prohibited practices described in paragraph 2.6 above, which contravene section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Act.

4.

COOPERATION

4.1. Standard Chartered Bank confirms that it has ceased to engage in the conduct set out in paragraph 2.6 above.

4.2. Standard Chartered Bank has agreed to fully cooperate with the Commission in relation to the prosecution of other participants in the alleged contravention in the Complaint.

4.3. Standard Chartered Bank has agreed to provide evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control (and which is not subject to legal privilege) concerning the alleged contraventions contained in this Settlement Agreement.

5.

AGREEMENT

REGARDING FUTURE

CONDUCT

5.1. Standard Chartered Bank agrees and undertakes to:

5.1.1 refrain from engaging in any conduct that may be in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Act, and from engaging in any prohibited practice in future;

5.1.2 prepare and circulate a statement summarizing the contents of this Settlement Agreement to its employees, managers and directors who have market-making responsibilities at Standard Chartered Bank within

30 (thirty) days from the date of confirmation of this Settlement Agreement as an order of the Tribunal;

5.1.3 continue to implement its existing competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors, and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme should include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention of the Act;

5.1.4 submit a copy of such compliance programme to the Commission within 90 (ninety) days from the date of confirmation of the Settlement Agreement as an order by the Tribunal.

6.

ADMINISTRATIVE

PENALTY

6.1. Having regard to the provisions of section 58(1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 59(1)(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, Standard Chartered Bank is liable to pay an administrative penalty.

6.2. Standard Chartered Bank agrees and undertakes to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R42 715 880 (Forty-Two Million Seven Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Rands). This amount does not exceed 10% (ten percent) of Standard Chartered Bank's annual turnover for the financial year ending 31 December 2019.

6.3. Standard Chartered Bank will pay the amount of the administrative penalty set out in paragraph 6.2 above to the Commission within 30 (Thirty) days from date of the confirmation of this Settlement Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6.4. The payment shall be made into the Commission’s bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name: Absa Bank

Branch name: Pretoria

Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account

Account number: [....]

Account type: Current Account

Branch Code: 632005

Reference: 2015Apr0147/2016Aug0432/Standard

Chartered Bank

6.5. The penalty will then be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

7.

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT

This Settlement Agreement, upon confirmation as an order of the Tribunal, is entered into in full and final settlement and concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Standard Chartered Bank relating to the conduct that comprises the Commission investigation under Case Nos. 2015Apr0147 and 2016Aug0432. Upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, no further action will be brought by the Commission against Standard Chartered Bank, its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, current or former employees,

managers and directors with respect to the matters comprising the alleged contraventions in the Complaint.

Dated and signed at Singapore on the 13th day of November 2023

For Standard Chartered Bank

Roberto Hoornweg

Global Head Financial Markets

For the Commission

Doris Tshepe Commissioner

Dated and signed at

on the day of 2023

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.