Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v British Airways Plc (019257) [2014] ZACT 99; [2014] 2 CPLR 396 (CT) (13 August 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and British Airways Plc, finding that the respondent admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act by coordinating fuel surcharge rates with Virgin Atlantic. The Tribunal accepted the administrative penalty of R21,765,207.00, which does not exceed the statutory maximum of 10% of annual turnover. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement included appropriate undertakings for future compliance and concluded all proceedings between the parties in relation to the investigated contraventions.

Court disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed.

Orders

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and British Airways Plc is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • British Airways Plc must pay an administrative penalty of R21,765,207.00 to the Competition Commission within 30 calendar days of this order.
  • British Airways Plc must submit its compliance programme to the Competition Commission within 10 days of signature of the agreement.
  • This order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and British Airways Plc in relation to the investigated contraventions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Tembinkosi Bonakele

British Airways Plc

Respondent Counsel: Maria da Cunha

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 21,765,207

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Settlement Confirmation / Order Confirming Settlement Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that British Airways Plc, together with Virgin Atlantic, engaged in prohibited practices by coordinating fuel surcharge rates for passengers on the United Kingdom–South Africa routes, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The Commission submitted that British Airways Plc cooperated fully with the investigation and agreed to a settlement, including an administrative penalty and future compliance undertakings.
Respondent
British Airways Plc admitted to participating in the price coordination and concerted practices as alleged, acknowledged the contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i), and agreed to pay an administrative penalty. The respondent undertook to refrain from future contraventions and to implement a compliance programme to ensure adherence to competition law.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    Section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements or concerted practices between competitors involving price fixing.

  2. 02

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    Section 58(1)(a)(iii) empowers the Tribunal to confirm settlement agreements as orders.

  3. 03

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 59(2)

    Administrative penalties for contraventions must not exceed 10% of the respondent's annual turnover in the preceding financial year.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and British Airways Plc, finding that the respondent admitted to contravening section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act by coordinating fuel surcharge rates with Virgin Atlantic. The Tribunal accepted the administrative penalty of R21,765,207.00, which does not exceed the statutory maximum of 10% of annual turnover. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement included appropriate undertakings for future compliance and concluded all proceedings between the parties in relation to the investigated contraventions.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of cooperation by respondents in competition investigations, which can facilitate efficient resolution of matters.
  • The implementation of compliance programmes by firms is essential to prevent future contraventions and promote a culture of competition law compliance.

Court disposition

Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed.

  • The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and British Airways Plc is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • British Airways Plc must pay an administrative penalty of R21,765,207.00 to the Competition Commission within 30 calendar days of this order.
  • British Airways Plc must submit its compliance programme to the Competition Commission within 10 days of signature of the agreement.
  • This order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and British Airways Plc in relation to the investigated contraventions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2014] ZACT 99

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No: 019257

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission.....................................................................................................Applicant

and

British Airways Plc................................................................................................................Respondent

Panel: N Manoim (Presiding Member)

Y Carrim (Tribunal Member)

M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 13 August 2014

Decided on: 13 August 2014

Order

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and British Airways Plc, annexed hereto marked “A”.

13 August 2014

Date

Presiding Member

N Manoim

Concurring: Y Carrim and M Mokuena

IN THE

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

HELD AT PRETORIA

CT Case No: 41/CR/Apr12

CC Case No: 2008/Jan3488

THE COMPETITION COMMISSION................................................................................Applicant

BRITISH AIRWAYS Plc.....................................................................................................Respondent

In re:

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC.........................................................................................First Respondent

VIRGIN ATLANTIC

AIRWAYS LIMITED.......................................................Second Respondent

SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC

IN RESPECT OF AN ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(b)(i) OF THE COMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED.

The Commission and BA Plc In the above matter hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal to have this Agreement confirmed as an order as provided for in terms of section 27(1) (d) as read with section 58(1) (a) (iii) of the Act

1. Definitions

1.1 For the purposes of this agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1.1 “Act” means the Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended,

1.1.2 “this Agreement” means the agreement set out herein, duly signed by the Commissioner and the Respondent

1.1.3 “BA Plc" means British Airways Plc, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of England and Wales with its registered office at Waterside, Harmondsworth, England.

1.1.4 “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa» a statutory body established in terms of section: 19 of the Act with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, fyfulayo Building (Block C); the Dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng,

1.1.5 "Applicant” means the Competition Commission of South Africa

1.1.6 “Commissioner” means the Competition Commissioner, the Chief Executive Officer of the Commission appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act,

1.1.7 "Competition Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act.

1.1.8 “Compiaint” means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner under case number 2008/Jan3488 and subsequently referred to the Competition Tribunal under case number 41/GR/Aprl2;

1.1.9 “Respondents” means collectively British Airways Plc and Virgin Atlantia

1.1.10 “the Republic” means the Republic of South Africa

1.1.11 "Virgin Atlantic” means Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited, a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of England and Wales with Its headquarters at Crawley Business Quarter, RH10 9NU, West Sussex, England,

2. The Complaint and Complaint investigation

2.1 On 24 January 2008 the Cornnnfssionef initiated the Complaint against BA Plc and Virgin Atlantic in respect of an alleged contravention of section of the Act relating to a component of prices (namely fuel surcharges) in the international market for passenger airline services, including services into and from the Republic.

2.2 Upon completion of its investigation into the Complaint, the Commission found that BA Plc had engaged in the following Prohibited Practices:

2.2.1 During the period of August 2004 to January 200$, BA Plc and Virgin Atlantic participated in an agreement and/or concerted practice by which they coordinated their pricing in relation to their respective fuel surcharge rates charged to passengers travelling on the United Kingdom to South Africa routes and wee versa through the exchange of pricing and other commercially sensitive information in contravention of section 4(1) (b)(1) of the Act

3. Complaint Referral and Settlement Negotiations

On 12 April 2012 the Commission referred the Complaint to the Tribunal for adjudication in terms of section 50(1) of the Act, read with Ruie 14(1) (a) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Tribunal. BA Plc subsequently entered into settlement negotiations with the Commission. The settlement negotiations culminated in this Agreement.

4. Admission

BA Plc admits that during the period of August 2004 to January 2006 BA Plc and Virgin Atlantic participated m an agreement and/or concerted practice by which they coordinated their pricing in relation to their respective fuel surcharge rates charged to passengers travelling on the United Kingdom to South Africa routes and vice versa through the exchange of pricing and other commercially sensitive information in contravention of section 4{l)(b)(i) ot the Act.

5. Agreement Concerning Future Conduct

5.1 BA Plc has fully cooperated with the Commission in its investigation of the matter and has provided information that assisted the Commission in concluding its investigation.

5.2 BA Plc agrees that it will in future refrain from engaging in the conduct which Is the subject of the Complaint Referral and which may constitute a contravention of section 4(1) (b) (j) of the Act.

5.3 BA Plc has already initiated a compliance program designed to ensure that the relevant employees and directors are informed of and comply with their obligations under competition law and the provisions of the Act. A copy of this programme shall be submitted to the Commission within 10 days of the signature of this agreement

6. Administrative Penalty

6.1 In terms of section 58(1)(a) (iii) of the Act read with section 59(1) (a), 59(2) and (3) of the Act BA Plc agrees to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R21 765 207,00 (twenty-one million) seven hundred and sixty-five thousand, two hundred and ninety-seven rands),

6.2 The above amount does not exceed 10% of BA Plc's annual turnover into or from the Republic In its 2011 financial year.

6.3 The penalty amount is to be paid into the bank account of the Commission within 30 calendar days from the date of confirmation of this Agreement by the Tribunal The Commission's banking details are as follows:

Bank: ABSA Bank

Name of Account: The Competition Commission Fees

Branch Name: Pretoria

Branch Code: 023345

Account Number: 4[...]

Payment reference: 2008Jan3488Brítísh Airways

6.4 The Commission wili pay over the penalty amount to the National Revenue Fund referred to in Section 59(4) of the Act,

7. Full and Final Settlement

This Agreement upon confirmation thereof as an order by the Competition Tribunal, concludes ail proceedings between the Commission and BA Plc, in relation to any alleged contraventions of the Act that are the subject of the Commission's investigation under case number 2008Jan3438 and its referral to the Tribunal under case number 41/CRApr12.

FOR BA Plc:

Dated and: signed at London on this the 20th day of June 2014.

Signature

Name: Maria da Cunha

Job description: Director of Legal and People

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Dated and signed at Pretoria on this the 14th day of July 2014

Tembinkosi Bonakele

Commissioner

Competition Commission of South Africa

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.