Competition Commission v Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd (CR029Sep09; SA203Mar23) [2023] ZACT 62 (23 July 2023)
The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd. The Tribunal found that the agreement was entered into to resolve allegations of anti-competitive conduct, including price fixing and market allocation, in the long steel products market. Although Cape Gate did not admit liability, it agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R1,375,344.32, which does not exceed 10% of its annual turnover, and to implement a competition law compliance programme. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement complied with the requirements of the Competition Act and that its confirmation would bring finality to the proceedings between the...
- Citation
- [2023] ZACT 62
- Parties
- Applicant: The Competition Commission; Respondent: Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2023
- Case Number
- CR029Sep09
- Procedural Posture
- Settlement Application / Settlement Agreement Confirmation
- Outcome
- Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the parties concluded.
- Judges
- G Budlender, I Valodia, A Ndoni
- Legal Topics
- Price Fixing, Market Allocation, Administrative Penalty, Settlement Agreement, Corporate Leniency Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Competition Commission
Applicant
Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Settlement Agreement Confirmation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) and (ii) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing and market allocation for long steel products.
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate and compliant with the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd. The Tribunal found that the agreement was entered into to resolve allegations of anti-competitive conduct, including price fixing and market allocation, in the long steel products market. Although Cape Gate did not admit liability, it agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R1,375,344.32, which does not exceed 10% of its annual turnover, and to implement a competition law compliance programme. The Tribunal was satisfied that the settlement agreement complied with the requirements of the Competition Act and that its confirmation would bring finality to the proceedings between the...
Court Disposition
Settlement agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the parties concluded.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Cape Gate (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R1,375,344.32 within 60 days of confirmation of the settlement agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment