Competition Commission v Casalinga Investments CC Trading as Waste Rite (CR133Sep15/SA218Nov18) [2018] ZACT 82 (28 November 2018)
The Tribunal found that Waste Rite admitted to collusive tendering and price fixing in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) and (iii) of the Competition Act. The parties entered into a consent agreement, which included an administrative penalty less than 10% of Waste Rite's annual turnover for 2015. Waste Rite ceased trading and undertook not to engage in future collusion, and its sole member agreed to cooperate with the Commission in prosecuting Crossmoor Transport. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement met the requirements of the Act and confirmed it as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Waste Rite regarding the admitted conduct.
- Citation
- [2018] ZACT 82
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: Casalinga Investments CC Trading as Waste Rite
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2018
- Case Number
- CR133Sep15/SA218Nov18
- Procedural Posture
- Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
- Outcome
- The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Casalinga Investments CC trading as Waste Rite is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Judges
- N Manoim, A Ndoni, F Tregenna
- Legal Topics
- Collusive Tendering, Price Fixing, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement, Contravention of Section 4
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
Casalinga Investments CC Trading as Waste Rite
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Settlement Application / Consent Agreement Confirmation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Casalinga Investments CC trading as Waste Rite contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) and (iii) of the Competition Act by collusive tendering and price fixing.
- 2 Whether the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Waste Rite should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- 3 Whether the administrative penalty agreed upon is appropriate under the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that Waste Rite admitted to collusive tendering and price fixing in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) and (iii) of the Competition Act. The parties entered into a consent agreement, which included an administrative penalty less than 10% of Waste Rite's annual turnover for 2015. Waste Rite ceased trading and undertook not to engage in future collusion, and its sole member agreed to cooperate with the Commission in prosecuting Crossmoor Transport. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement met the requirements of the Act and confirmed it as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Waste Rite regarding the admitted conduct.
Court Disposition
The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Casalinga Investments CC trading as Waste Rite is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
Orders
- The consent agreement annexed as 'A' is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Waste Rite is liable to pay an administrative penalty of R225,690 to the Competition Commission within 30 days of confirmation of the consent agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment