Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd (019786) [2014] ZACT 82 (19 November 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in collusive tendering with Infraset in respect of the South Deep Mine project, specifically by agreeing to provide a cover price and pay a loser’s fee. This conduct constitutes a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The parties entered into a consent agreement in which Civcon accepted liability, agreed to pay an administrative penalty equal to 1% of its annual turnover for the year ended February 2013, and undertook to implement a competition law compliance programme and refrain from future contraventions. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement addressed the contravention and provided for appropriate remedies. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Civcon in respect of this conduct.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Proceedings between the Commission and Civcon concluded in respect of the admitted conduct.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R798,385.98 to the Commission in six monthly instalments of R133,064.33 each.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd shall circulate a summary of the agreement to its employees, managers, and directors within 14 days.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd undertakes to refrain from future contraventions and to engage in competitive bidding.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Tembinkosi Bonakele

Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Coenie JB Vermaak

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 798,385.98
  • Monthly Instalment: ZAR 133,064.33
  • Loser's Fee Paid: ZAR 171,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission submitted that Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd participated in collusive tendering by agreeing with Infraset to provide a cover price and pay a loser’s fee in respect of the South Deep Mine project, in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Commission argued that this conduct distorted competition and warranted the imposition of an administrative penalty. The Commission sought confirmation of the consent agreement, which included admissions by Civcon, undertakings for future compliance, and payment of a penalty.
Respondent
Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd admitted to the conduct described, specifically the agreement with Infraset regarding a cover price and loser’s fee. Civcon agreed to the terms of the consent agreement, including the payment of an administrative penalty, implementation of a competition law compliance programme, and undertakings to refrain from future contraventions. Civcon requested that the Tribunal confirm the agreement as a final settlement of the matter.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, section 4(1)(b)(iii)

    Collusive tendering, including cover pricing and loser’s fees, constitutes a prohibited restrictive horizontal practice under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, sections 49D, 58(1)(a)(iii), 58(1)(b)

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order if the parties admit contravention and agree to appropriate remedies, including administrative penalties.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, sections 59(1)(a), 59(2), 59(3)

    Administrative penalties for contraventions may be determined as a percentage of annual turnover, subject to the provisions of the Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in collusive tendering with Infraset in respect of the South Deep Mine project, specifically by agreeing to provide a cover price and pay a loser’s fee. This conduct constitutes a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The parties entered into a consent agreement in which Civcon accepted liability, agreed to pay an administrative penalty equal to 1% of its annual turnover for the year ended February 2013, and undertook to implement a competition law compliance programme and refrain from future contraventions. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement addressed the contravention and provided for appropriate remedies. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Civcon in respect of this conduct.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes the importance of compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions of competition law.
  • The settlement process initiated by the Commission has contributed to the efficient resolution of widespread collusion in the construction sector.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Proceedings between the Commission and Civcon concluded in respect of the admitted conduct.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R798,385.98 to the Commission in six monthly instalments of R133,064.33 each.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd shall circulate a summary of the agreement to its employees, managers, and directors within 14 days.
  • Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd undertakes to refrain from future contraventions and to engage in competitive bidding.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2014] ZACT 82

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No: 019786

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission..........................................................................................Applicant

and

Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd.......................................................................................Respondent

Panel: M Mazwai (Presiding Member)

M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

F Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

Heard on:19 November 2014

Decided on : 19 November 2014

Order

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd, annexed hereto marked “A”.

19 November 2014

Date

Presiding Member

Ms. M Mazwai

Concurring: Ms. M Mokuena and Prof. F Tregenna

IN THE

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

(HELD IN PRETORIA)

CT CASE NO:

CC CASE NO: 2009Sep4641

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION........................................................................Applicant

CIVCON CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD...................................................................Respondent

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D, READ WITH SECTIONS 58(1)(a)(iii) and 58(1)(b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND CIVCON CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD , IN RESPECT OF CONTRAVENTIONS OF SECTION 4(1 )(b)(iii) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998.

Preamble

The Competition Commission and Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Competition Tribunal in terms of section 49D as read with sections 58(1 )(a)(iii) and 58(1 )(b) of the Competition Act no. 89 of 1998, as amended (“the Act”), in respect of contraventions of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Act, on the terms below:

1 DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this consent agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1 “Act” means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;

1.2 “Civcon” means Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd, a company duly incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa with its principal place of business at 18 Industry Road, Clayville, Oiifantsfontein, Gauteng, 1665. Civcon is involved in the provision of civil infrastructure, mining work, roads construction and building work. Civcon, is formerly known as Civcontract Civils (Pty) Ltd.

1.3 “CLP” means the Commission’s Corporate Leniency Policy (Government Notice No. 628 of 23 May 2008, published in Government Gazette No. 31064 of 23 May 2008);

1.4 “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.5 “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

1.6 “Complaint” means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner of the Competition Commission in terms of section 49B of the Act under case number

2009Sep4641;

1.7 “Consent Agreement” means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Civcon;

1.8 “Cover Price” means generally, a price that is provided by a firm that wishes to win a tender to a firm that does not wish to do so, in order that the firm that does not wish to win the tender may submit a higher price; or alternatively a price that is provided by a firm that does not wish to win a tender to a firm that does wish to win that tender in order that the firm that wishes to win the tender may submit a lower price;

1.9 “Infraset” means a division of Aveng (Africa) Limited (“Aveng”), a public company incorporated in terms of the laws of the Republic of South Africa with its registered place of business at Block A, Aveng Grinaker-LTA Park, Jurgens Street, Jet Park, Boksburg, 1459. Aveng is a multi-disciplinary construction and engineering group, anchored in South Africa with expertise in a number of market sectors namely power, mining, infrastructure, commercial, retail, industrial, oil and gas;

1.10 “Invitation” means the Invitation to Firms in the Construction Industry to Engage in Settlement of Contraventions of the Competition Act, as published on the website of the Commission on 1 February 2011;

1.11 “Loser’s fee” in the context of collusive tendering, means a fee paid by the successful tenderer to the losing tenderer(s) as compensation for the costs of tendering;

1.12 “Non-prescribed prohibited practices” refers to prohibited restrictive horizontal practices relating to the construction industry that are contemplated in section 4(1 )(b) of the Act and that are on-going or had not ceased three years before the complaint was initiated, as contemplated in section 67 of the Act;

1.13 “Parties” means the Commission and Civcon;

1.14 “Prescribed prohibited practices” refers to prohibited restrictive horizontal practices relating to the construction industry that are contemplated in section 4(1 )(b) of the Act and that ceased after 30 November 1998, but more than three years before the complaint was initiated;

1.15 “Respondent” means Civcon;

1.16 “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 3rd Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2 BACKGROUND

2.1 On 01 September 2009, following the receipt of applications for immunity in terms of the CLP, the Commission initiated a complaint in terms of section 49B(1) of the Act under case number 2009Sep4641 into particular prohibited practices relating to conduct in the construction industry in relation to various projects, by the firms listed below.

2.2 The complaint concerned alleged contraventions of section 4(1)(b) of the Act as regards price fixing, market allocation and collusive tendering. The investigation was initiated against the following firms: Grinaker LTA , Aveng (Africa) Ltd, Stefanutti Stocks Holdings Ltd, Group Five Ltd, Murray & Roberts, Concor Ltd, G. Liviero & Son Building (Pty) Ltd, Giuricich Coastal Projects (Pty) Ltd, Hochtief Construction AG, Dura Soletanche-Bachy (Pty) Ltd, Nishimatsu Construction Co Ltd, Esorfranki Ltd, VNA Pilings CC, Rodio Geotechnics (Pty) Ltd, Diabor Ltd, Gauteng Piling (Pty) Ltd, Fairbrother Geotechnical CC, Geomechanics CC, Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Ltd and other construction firms, including joint ventures.

2.3 The Commission’s investigation of the above complaint, as well as of several others in the construction industry, led the Commission to believe that there was widespread collusion in the construction sector in contravention of section 4(1 )(b)(iii) of the Act. Accordingly, in line with the purposes of the Act as well as the Commission’s functions, the Commission decided to invite construction firms that were involved in collusive conduct to apply to engage in settlement on favourable terms.

The Invitation was issued in the interests of transparency, efficiency, adaptability and development of the construction industry, the provision of competitive prices. It was also intended to expedite the finalisation of the investigations in a cost-effective manner.

2.4 The Invitation was published on the Commission’s website on 1 February 2011. The Invitation required firms to apply for settlement by disclosing all construction projects that were the subject of prescribed and non-prescribed prohibited practices. The closing date to apply for settlement in terms of the invitation was 15 April 2011.

2.5 The Commission received settlement applications from twenty one (21) firms that disclosed a total number of 300 projects which were the subject of collusive conduct. Of the three hundred (300) projects disclosed, 160 (one hundred and sixty) (160) projects involved prescribed prohibited practices and 140 (one hundred and forty) involved non-prescribed prohibited practices. The 21 firms that responded to the invitation implicated 25 firms which did not respond to the Invitation. Of the 21 firms, fifteen concluded consent agreements with the Commission, which agreements were confirmed as orders of the Tribunal on 22 and 23 July 2013. This phase of the investigation of the complaint was termed “’Phase 1”.

2.8 Upon completion of Phase 1, the Commission proceeded to investigate the conduct of the 25 firms that did not respond to the Invitation and were implicated by those that applied. Civcon is one of the 25 implicated firms. Civcon has agreed to settle the project it is implicated in.

3 CONDUCT IN

CONTRAVENTION OF THE ACT

South Deep Mine Project

3.1. Civcon reached an agreement with Infraset on or about 15 September 2006, in that they agreed on a cover price and a loser’s fee in respect of the South Deep Mine project.

3.2. In terms of the agreement, Infraset received a cover price from Civcon to enable Infraset to win the tender, it was further agreed that, in exchange for the cover price, Infraset would pay Civcon a loser’s or a compensation fee in the amount of R500 000.00 (Five Hundred Thousand Rand) should Infraset win the tender. Despite this agreement, Civcon was awarded the tender. Although it was agreed that the successful bidder would pay the loser an amount of R500 000.00, Infraset received a total amount of,R171 000.00 (One Hundred and Seventy One Thousand Rand), including value added tax, as a compensation or a loser’s fee from Civcon. This conduct is collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1) (b) (iii) of the Act.

3.3. The project was for the manufacture and delivery of pre-cast concrete brattice wall panels at the South Deep Twin Vent Shaft Storage Area.

4 ADMISSION

Civcon admits that it entered into the agreement detailed in paragraph 3 above with its competitor, Infraset, in contravention of section 4(1 )(b) (iii) of the Act.

5 FUTURE CONDUCT

Civcon agrees and undertakes to:

5.1. prepare and circulate a statement summarising the content of this agreement to its employees, managers and directors within fourteen (14) days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal;

5.2. refrain from engaging in collusive tendering in contravention of section 4(1 )(b)(iii) of the Act, and from engaging in any prohibited practice under the Act in future;

5.3. develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme should include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention of the Act;

5.4. submit a copy of such compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of the date of confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order by the Tribunal; and

5.5. undertake henceforth to engage in competitive bidding.

6, ADMINSTRATIVE

PENALTY

6.1. Having regard to the provisions of sections 58(1 )(a)(iii) as read with sections 59(1 )(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, Civcon agrees that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty of R798 385.98 (Seven Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty Five Rand and Ninety Eight Cents) which penalty represents 1% of Civcon’s annual turnover for the year ended February 2013.

6.2. Civcon shall pay R798 385.98 to the Commission in six (6) monthly instalments of R133 064.33 (One Hundred and Thirty Three Thousand Sixty Four Rand and Thirty Three Cents) per month. The first monthly payment shall be payable within 30 days from the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunai.

6.3. This payment shall be made into the Commission’s bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name: Absa Bank

Branch name: Pretoria

Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account

Account number: 4[...]

Account type: Current Account

Branch Code: 323 345

Reference: Case number 2009Sep4641/Civcon.

6.4. The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

7. FULL AND FINAL

SETTLEMENT

This agreement is entered into in full and final settlement of the specific conduct set out in paragraph 3 of this consent agreement and, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Civcon in respect of this conduct only.

For Civcon Construction (Pty) Ltd

Dated and signed at TECHNOPARK on the day of 11th day of September 2014

COENIE JB VERMAAK

CHIEF EXECUTIVE

OFFICER

For the Commission

Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the 22 day of September 2014

TEMBINKOSI

BONAKELE

COMMISSIONER

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.