Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd (019810) [2014] ZACT 85 (19 November 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in collusive tendering practices in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The consent agreement, which included an admission of liability, undertakings to cooperate with the Commission, implementation of a compliance programme, and payment of an administrative penalty amounting to 7% of annual turnover, was deemed appropriate and proportionate. The Tribunal was satisfied that the agreement addressed the contravention and provided adequate remedies. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the parties in respect of the admitted conduct.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd in respect of the admitted conduct concluded.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R849,873.36, representing 7% of its annual turnover for the financial year ended December 2013.
  • 50% of the administrative penalty shall be paid within 7 days of confirmation of the order; the balance shall be paid in two equal quarterly instalments within 8 months.
  • Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate fully with the Commission in ongoing investigations and prosecutions related to the complaint.
  • This order constitutes full and final settlement of the conduct described in the agreement between the parties.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant Counsel: Tembinkosi Bonakele

Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Ian Pettey

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 849,873.36
  • Penalty Percentage of Annual Turnover: 7

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission submitted that Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd, along with other furniture removal firms, engaged in collusive tendering practices by exchanging cover prices and coordinating bids for tenders issued by government departments and large corporates. The Commission argued that this conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The Commission sought confirmation of the consent agreement, which included an admission of contravention, cooperation undertakings, future compliance measures, and an administrative penalty calculated as 7% of the respondent's annual turnover for 2013.
Respondent
Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd admitted to the conduct described by the Commission, acknowledging its participation in 81 instances of cover pricing and collusive tendering. The respondent agreed to cooperate fully with the Commission in ongoing investigations and prosecutions, to implement a competition law compliance programme, and to pay the agreed administrative penalty in instalments. The respondent requested confirmation of the consent agreement as a full and final settlement of the matter.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, section 4(1)(b)(iii)

    Collusive tendering, including the exchange of cover prices among competitors, constitutes a prohibited practice under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, sections 49D, 58(1)(a)(iii), 59(1)-(4)

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order if it is satisfied that the agreement addresses the contravention and includes appropriate remedies, including administrative penalties.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, section 59(2)-(4)

    The administrative penalty for a prohibited practice may not exceed 10% of the respondent's annual turnover and must be paid into the National Revenue Fund.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd admitted to engaging in collusive tendering practices in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act. The consent agreement, which included an admission of liability, undertakings to cooperate with the Commission, implementation of a compliance programme, and payment of an administrative penalty amounting to 7% of annual turnover, was deemed appropriate and proportionate. The Tribunal was satisfied that the agreement addressed the contravention and provided adequate remedies. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the parties in respect of the admitted conduct.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal emphasised the importance of competition law compliance programmes for firms operating in regulated sectors.
  • The Tribunal noted that cooperation with the Commission in investigations and prosecutions is a mitigating factor in determining administrative penalties.
  • The confirmation of consent agreements as orders promotes efficient resolution of competition law contraventions and encourages voluntary compliance.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd in respect of the admitted conduct concluded.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R849,873.36, representing 7% of its annual turnover for the financial year ended December 2013.
  • 50% of the administrative penalty shall be paid within 7 days of confirmation of the order; the balance shall be paid in two equal quarterly instalments within 8 months.
  • Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd shall implement a competition law compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 60 days.
  • Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate fully with the Commission in ongoing investigations and prosecutions related to the complaint.
  • This order constitutes full and final settlement of the conduct described in the agreement between the parties.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2014] ZACT 85

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No: 019810

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission.......................................................................................................Applicant

And

Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd.......................................................................................................Respondent

Panel: M Mazwai (Presiding Member)

M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

F Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 19 November 2014

Decided on : 19 November 2014

Order

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd, annexed hereto marked “A”.

19 November 2014

Date

Presiding Member

Ms. M Mazwai

Concurring: Ms. M Mokuena and Prof. F Tregenna

ANNEXURE “A”

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

(HELD IN PRETORIA)

CT Case No.

CC Case No: 2010Nov5447

In the matter between

COMPETITION COMMISSION...............................................................................................Applicant

and

CROWN RELOCATIONS (PTY) LTD...................................................................................Respondent

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 490 AS READ WITH SECTIONS 58(1 mm and 58(1)(b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, NO. 89 OF 1998, AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND CROWN RELOCATIONS (PTY) LTD, IN RESPECT OF CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1 )(b) (lit) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998.

Preamble

The Competition Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal in terms of section 490 read with section 58(1 ){a)p) and 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act 1998 Act No, 89 of 1998, as amended (the Act), in respect of contraventions of section 4(1 ){b) (iil) of the Act, on the terms set out below.

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1 “Act” means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;

1.2 “Crown Relocations” means Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd.. a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa with its principal place of business at No. 1 Drakensberger Drive, Longmeadow Business Estate West, Modderfantein, Johannesburg.

1.3 “CLP” means the Commission's Corporate Leniency Policy (Government Gazette Notice no. 828 of 23 May 2008) published in Government Gazette no.31GS4 of 23 May 2008;

1.4 “Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at IVluiayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.5 “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

1.6 “Complaint” means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner in terms of section 49B(1) of tie Act under case number 2G11Jun0069;

1.7 “Consent Agreement” means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd;

1.8 “Cover Price” means generally, a price that is provided by a firm that wishes to win a tender to a firm that does not wish to do so; in

order that the firm that does not wish to win the tender may submit a higher price; or alternatively a price that is provided by a firm that does not wish to win a tender to a firm that does wish to win that tender in order that the firm that wishes to win the tender may submit a lower price;

1.9 “Parties"' means the Commission and Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd; and

1.10 “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at Muiayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnysids, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS

2.1 On 3 November 2010, the Commission initiated a complaint in terms of section 49(B)(1) of the Act into alleged prohibited practices

relating to collusive tendering in the market for the provision of furniture removal services in South Africa against J.B Relief

Transport CC, Patrick. Removals (Pty) Ltd, Cape Express Removals (Pty) Ltd, Sifiktfe Transport CC, Gloway Transport CC, De Wet Human CC t/a Viking

Furniture, Stuttaford Van Lines (Pty) Ltd and Pro-Pack Removals CC.

2.2 On 1 June 2011, the Commission amended the complaint to include other furniture removal firms as respondents in the complaint on the basis of further information obtained in the investigation of the complaint. These firms are A&B Movers CC, Advance Transport (Pty) Ltd* African Palletized Storage, Afriworid Furniture Removals CC, Core Relocations (Pty) Ltd, Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd, De Lange Transport (Pty) Ltd, Elliot international CC, Execu-Move CC, Joel Transport (Pty) Ltd; Langs Furniture Removals, Lowe Lines CC, Majorshelf, Matthee Removals, North Western Transport CC, Pïckfords Removals (Pty) Ltd, Pulse international Removals, Stanley's Removals CC,- Transfreight international CC, Western Transport Services CC, JMK Transport Services, Trapezium Removals, Elite International City to City Transport Wlets Removals, H&M Removals, AGS Frasers international (Pty) Ltd, and ali present members of the Professional Movers Association,

2.3 On 13 June 2013, the Commission further amended the complaint to include other furniture removal firms as respondents in the complaint on the basis of further information obtained in the investigation of the complaint These firms are Easy Moves CC, Reliable Removals CC, Deon Net Sole Proprietorship t/a AD Transport, Bear Transport (Pty) -Ltd, J&H Removals (Pty) Ltd, Mini Maxi Movers CC, Baxfer International Movers CC, Louis du Preez Sole Proprietorship t/a Removals 4 Less, A to 2 Relocation Services t/a The Moving Company and AKA Loading & Transport CC,

2.4 The firms fisted in paragraphs 2.1, 2.2 and 2,3 above shall hereinafter be referred to as the Respondents.

2.5 The Commission's investigation revealed the following:

2.5.1 During or about the period 2007 to at least December 2012, the firms identified- in paragraphs 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 above, being competitors in the market for the provision of furniture removal services agreed to tender coliusively in relation to the provision of furniture removal services.

2.5.2 In terms of the agreement a firm that was contacted first regarding a request for quotation for furniture removal services would offer to source two or more quotations on behalf of the customer, and would then contact two or more of its competitors and request the competitors to submit cover prices.

2.5.3 The cover prices would either be sent directly to the customer or to the competitor wishing to win the tender for onward submission to the customer.

2.5.4 The Respondents arranged to collude on tenders issued by various government departments, including but not limited to, the South African National Defence Force (SANDF), South African Police Services (SAPS), as well as tenders issued by large corporates such as Eskom and Pretoria Portland Cement (RFC),

2.5.5 The Commission further found-that, pursuant to the arrangement set out above, Crown Relocations had engaged in 81 instances of cover pricing.

2.5.6 This conduct constitutes collusive tendering in contravention of section 4{1)(b) (iii) of the Act.

3. ADMISSION

Crown Relocations admits that it engaged in the conduct set out. In paragraph 2.5 above in contravention of section, 4(1 )(b) (iii) of the Act.

4. CO-OPERATION

Crown; Relocations agrees to fully cooperate with the Commission in its investigation and prosecution of the remaining respondents in the complaint. This cooperation includes, but is not limited to:

4.1. To the extent that it is in existence, the provision of evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control, concerning the alleged contraventions contained in this Consent Agreement.

4.2. Testifying in the complaint referral (if any) in respect of the contraventions set out in this Consent Agreement.

5. FUTURE CONDUCT

Crown Relocations agrees to:

5.1 prepare and circulate a statement summarising the content of this agreement to its employees, managers and directors within fourteen (14) days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal;

5.2 refrain from engaging in conduct in contravention of section 4 (1 }{b) of the Act in future;

5.3 develop, implement and monitor a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage In future contraventions of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme should include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention: of the Act;

5.4. submit a copy of such compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of the date of confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order by the Tribunal; and

5.5 undertakes henceforth to engage in competitive bidding.

6.

ADMINISTRATIVE

PENALTY

6.1 Having regard to the provisions of sections 58(1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 59{1){a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, Crown Relocations t$ liable to pay an administrative penalty.

6.2 Crown Relocations agrees and undertakes to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R849 873,36 (eight hundred and forty nine thousand eight hundred and seventy three rands and thirty six cents). This administrative penalty represents 7% of its annual turnover for the financial year ended December 2013.

6.3 Crown Relocations will pay 50% of the amount set out in paragraph 6.2 above to the Commission within 7 (seven) days of the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of tie Tribunal.

6.4 Crown Relocations will thereafter pay the balance of the amount above in two equal quarterly instalments within 8 months from the date of the Tribunal's order.

6.5 The administrative penalty must be paid into the Commission’s bank account which is as follows:

Name; The Competition Commission Fee Account

Bank: Afosa Bank, Pretoria

Account Number: [...]

Branch Code: 323 345

Ref: 2011Jun0069/Crown Relocations

6.6 The administrative penalty will be paid over by the 'Commission to the National Revenue Fund m accordance with the provisions of section 59(4) of the Act.

7 Full and Final Settlement

This agreement upon confirmation as an order by tie Tribunal, Is entered into in full and final settlement of the conduct set out in paragraph 2.5 above and concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Crown Relocations in respect of this conduct only.

Dated and signed at Edenvale on the 16th day of October 2014

For Crown Relocations (Pty) Ltd

Chief Executive Officer

Name in Full: Ian Pettey

Dated and signed at PRETORIA on the 22 day of October 2014

For the Commission

Tembinkosi Bonakele

Competition Commissioner

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Corporate Leniency Policy (Government Gazette Notice no. 828 of 23 May 2008)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.