Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Kuehne and Nagel (Pty) Ltd (110/CR/Dec11) [2012] ZACT 13; [2012] 1 CPLR 88 (CT) (22 February 2012)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd admitted to participating in agreements with competitors to fix surcharges and fees in the freight forwarding sector, constituting a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The respondent agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R962,657.01, representing 5% of its relevant 2007 turnover, and undertook to cooperate with the Commission in further investigations and prosecutions. The respondent also committed to implementing a compliance programme and refraining from future contraventions. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement, including the penalty and undertakings, was appropriate and confirmed it as an order.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Proceedings between the parties concluded.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R962,657.01 to the Competition Commission within seven days of confirmation of this order.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate with the Commission in relation to prosecution of the conduct described in the consent agreement.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall refrain from any conduct that may contravene section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall develop and implement a compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 90 business days of confirmation of this order.
  • This order constitutes full and final settlement of all proceedings between the Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd and related entities regarding the conduct investigated under Case No. 2007OCT3236.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 962,657.01
  • Penalty as Percentage of 2007 Turnover: 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd, along with other freight forwarders, participated in discussions and agreements to fix the level of various surcharges and accessorial fees in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The Commission submitted that the respondent benefited from such conduct and that an administrative penalty of R962,657.01, constituting 5% of relevant 2007 turnover, is appropriate. The Commission requested confirmation of the consent agreement, which includes undertakings for future compliance and cooperation.
Respondent
Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd admitted to the conduct described by the Commission, acknowledged the contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i), and agreed to pay the proposed administrative penalty. The respondent undertook to cooperate with the Commission in ongoing investigations and prosecutions, to refrain from future contraventions, and to implement a compliance programme to ensure adherence to the Competition Act.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), section 4(1)(b)(i)

    A firm that participates in agreements to fix prices or surcharges with competitors in a horizontal relationship contravenes section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), sections 58(1)(a)(iii), 59(1)(a), 59(2), 59(3)

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order, including the imposition of an administrative penalty, where the parties admit contravention and agree to terms.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd admitted to participating in agreements with competitors to fix surcharges and fees in the freight forwarding sector, constituting a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The respondent agreed to pay an administrative penalty of R962,657.01, representing 5% of its relevant 2007 turnover, and undertook to cooperate with the Commission in further investigations and prosecutions. The respondent also committed to implementing a compliance programme and refraining from future contraventions. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement, including the penalty and undertakings, was appropriate and confirmed it as an order.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal notes the importance of compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions of competition law.
  • Cooperation by respondents in investigations and prosecutions is encouraged as it facilitates effective enforcement of the Act.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Proceedings between the parties concluded.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R962,657.01 to the Competition Commission within seven days of confirmation of this order.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate with the Commission in relation to prosecution of the conduct described in the consent agreement.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall refrain from any conduct that may contravene section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act.
  • Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd shall develop and implement a compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 90 business days of confirmation of this order.
  • This order constitutes full and final settlement of all proceedings between the Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd and related entities regarding the conduct investigated under Case No. 2007OCT3236.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2012] ZACT 13

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: 110/CR/Dec11

In the matter between:

THE COMPETITION

COMMISSION …..........................................................APPLICANT

And

KUEHNE + NAG EL (PTY) LTD …............................................................RESPONDENT

Panel: A Wessels (Presiding Member), A Ndoni (Tribunal Member) and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 18 January 2012

Amended agreement received on: 21 February 2012

Decided on: 22 February 2012

ORDER The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondent, annexed hereto marked "A". Presiding Member A Wessels Concurring: A Ndoni and M Mokuena

ORDER

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondent, annexed hereto marked "A".

Presiding Member

A Wessels

Concurring: A Ndoni and M Mokuena

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN PRETORIA CC Case No. 2007OCT3236 in the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION

COMMISSION …..............................................................Applicant and

KUEHNE + NAGEL (PTY) LTD …..................................................................Respondent

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN PRETORIA

CC Case No. 2007OCT3236

in the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION

COMMISSION …..............................................................Applicant

and

KUEHNE + NAGEL (PTY) LTD …..................................................................Respondent

The Competition Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of a Consent Agreement in terms of section 58 (1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 58(1 )(b) and 59(1 )(a) of the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended, on the terms set out below: 1. Definitions For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply: 1.1. "Act means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended; 1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng; 1.3. "Commissions? means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act; 1.4. "Complaint' means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner of the Competition Commission in terms of section 49B of the Act under case number 2007OCT3236; 1.5. "Consent Agreement" means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Limited; 1.6. 'K+N SA" means Kuehne + Nagel (Proprietary) Limited a company registered and incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South-Africa with registration number 1954/000602/07 and with its registered address, alternatively principal place of business at 9 Nguni Drive Edenvale 1609; 1.7. "K+N" means the Kuehne + Nagel Group of Companies. 1.8. "Parties" means the Commission and K+N SA; 1.9. "Respondents" means the firms subject to the Commission's investigation of the complaint initiated under case number 2007Oct3236, namely Kuehne+Nagel (Pty) Ltd, Kuehne+Nagel Group, Kuehne+Nagel International AG, Schenker South Africa (Pty)Ltd, Schenker AG Group, Deutsche Bahn AG, Expeditors International South Africa (Pty) Ltd, Expediters International, Panaipina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, UTI South

Africa (Pty) Ltd, UTI Worldwide Inc., DHL International (Pty) Ltd, DHL Global Forwarding, DHL International GmbH, Deutsche Post AG, BAX Global Inc., Dascher, Eagie Air Freight Inc., Emery Air Freight Corporation, Geologistics Corporation, Mahe Freight, Saima and SAAFF. 1.10. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 3rd Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. The Complaint and Complaint Investigation 2.1. On 2 October 2007 the Commissioner initiated a complaint agajnj£LBax, Dascher, Eagle, Emery, Expeditors, Geologistics,

Kuehne &yNagejf, Mine Freight, Panalpina, Sairna, Schenker and UTI in respect of ailegations that the respondents, being parties in a horizontal relationship in the provision of freight forwarding services, may have contravened sections 4(1 }(a), 4(l)(b)(i) and/or 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Act in that they discussed and agreed to fix the level of various surcharges and accessorial fees. 2.2 The Commission's investigation found, amongst others, that: 2.2.1 United Kingdom Air New Export System Security ("NES"}: During the period October 2002 to around 2005 various freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel Ltd (UK) in the United Kingdom participated in discussions aimed at achieving the introduction of a so called NES fee for shipments by air originating in the United Kingdom. The NES fee was to be applied in connection with costs arising through the application of a pre-clearance system introduced by the United Kingdom's customs authorities for shipments leaving the United Kingdom. 2.2.2 Air Automated Manifest System ("AMS") fee from Germany andSwitzerland: During July 2004 freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG in Germany and Kuhne + Nagel Aktiengeselischaft in Switzerland . participated in discussions aimed at achieving the introduction of a so called AMS fee for prepaid shipments by air to the US originating in Germany and Switzerland. Discussions also related to

the approximate level of the AMS fee. The AMS fee was to be applied in connection with costs arising through the application of a pre-clearance system introduced by the US customs authorities for shipments to the US. 2.2.3 Chinese Air Currency Adjustment Factor ("CAF"): During the period July 2005 to March 2006, freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel Ltd. (China) in Shangai, China agreed with competitors on the introduction of a currency adjustment factor or CAF for shipments by air originating in China. The CAF was designed to compensate freight forwarders for the losses incurred following a change in the value ratio of the US dollar to the Chinese renmimbi. 2.2.4 Hong Kong air Peak Season Surchage ("PSS"): During the period August 2005 to May 2007 various freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel Ltd. (HongKong) in Hong Kong participated in discussions aimed at exchanging information, such as start and end dates and approximate amounts, regarding the introduction of a peak season surcharge or PSS for shipments by air originating in Hong Kong. The PSS was designed to compensate freight forwarders for the rate increases imposed upon them by the air carriers during busy periods for air cargo shipments. 2.3 In light of its findings, the Commission took a decision to refer its findings of conduct in contravention of section 4{1)(b)(i) to the Tribunal for adjudication.

3. Statement of conduct by K+N SA K+N SA acknowledges that the conduct described above constitutes a contravention of section 4(1 )(b)(i) of the Act and admits that it benefited from such conduct.

4. Administrative Penalty In accordance with the provisions of section 58(1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 59(1 )(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, K+N SA is liable for and has agreed to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R962,657.01 (nine hundred and sixty two thousand six hundred and fifty seven Rand and one Cent), which amounts constitutes 5% of the relevant turnover in 2007.

K+N SA will pay the amount set out in paragraph 4.3 above to the Commission within seven days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

This payment shall be made into the Commission's bank account, details of which are as follows: Bank name: Absa Bank Branch name: Pretoria Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account Account number: 4050778576 Account type: Current Account Branch Code: 323 345 4.4 The penalty will.bewill.be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

5. Agreement Concerning Future Conduct 5.1 K+N SA agrees to cooperate with the Commission in relation to theprosecution of the conduct described in this Consent Agreement. Withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, K+N SA specifically agrees to: Provide witnesses to testify in the complaint referral (if any) in respect of alleged contraventions covered by this Consent Agreement; and

To the extent that it is in existence, and has not already been provided to the Commission, provide evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control, concerning the alleged contraventions contained in this Consent Agreement. K+N SA agrees that it will refrain from any conduct that may contravene section 4(1 )(b) of the Act.

K+N SA undertakes to develop and implement a compliance programme, with corporate governance, designed to ensure that all its relevant employees are aware of the provisions of the Competition Act and do not contravene them; and to submit a copy of the aforementioned compliance programme outlined above to the Commission within 90 business days of the date of confirmation of this Consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6. Full and Final Settlement This agreement is entered into in full and final settlement and, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and K+N SA, Kuehne+Nagel Group, Kuehne+Nage! International AG and any other company that forms part of the Kuehne+Nagel group of companies relating to any alleged contravention of the Act that is the subject of the Commission's

investigation under Case No. 2007Oct 3236. Dated and signed at EDENVALE on the 10th day of FEBRUARY 2012. FOR KUEHNE + NAGEL (PTY) LIMITED

The Competition Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of a Consent Agreement in terms of section 58 (1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 58(1 )(b) and 59(1 )(a) of the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended, on the terms set out below:

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1. "Act means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;

1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.3. "Commissions? means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

1.4. "Complaint' means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner of the Competition Commission in terms of section 49B of the Act under case number 2007OCT3236;

1.5. "Consent Agreement" means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Kuehne + Nagel (Pty) Limited;

1.6. 'K+N SA" means Kuehne + Nagel (Proprietary) Limited a company registered and incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South-Africa with registration number 1954/000602/07 and with its registered address, alternatively principal place of business at 9 Nguni Drive Edenvale 1609;

1.7. "K+N" means the Kuehne + Nagel Group of Companies.

1.8. "Parties" means the Commission and K+N SA;

1.9. "Respondents" means the firms subject to the Commission's investigation of the complaint initiated under case number 2007Oct3236, namely Kuehne+Nagel (Pty) Ltd, Kuehne+Nagel Group, Kuehne+Nagel International AG, Schenker South Africa (Pty)Ltd, Schenker AG Group, Deutsche Bahn AG, Expeditors International South Africa (Pty) Ltd, Expediters International, Panaipina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, UTI South

Africa (Pty) Ltd, UTI Worldwide Inc., DHL International (Pty) Ltd, DHL Global Forwarding, DHL International GmbH, Deutsche Post AG, BAX Global Inc., Dascher, Eagie Air Freight Inc., Emery Air Freight Corporation, Geologistics Corporation, Mahe Freight, Saima and SAAFF.

1.10. "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 3rd Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. The Complaint and Complaint Investigation

2.1. On 2 October 2007 the Commissioner initiated a complaint agajnj£LBax, Dascher, Eagle, Emery, Expeditors, Geologistics,

Kuehne &yNagejf, Mine

Freight, Panalpina, Sairna, Schenker and UTI in respect of ailegations that the respondents, being parties in a horizontal relationship in the provision of freight forwarding services, may have contravened sections 4(1 }(a), 4(l)(b)(i) and/or 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Act in that they discussed and agreed to fix the level of various surcharges and accessorial fees.

2.2 The Commission's investigation found, amongst others, that:

2.2.1 United Kingdom Air New Export System Security ("NES"}:

During the period October 2002 to around 2005 various freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel Ltd (UK) in the United Kingdom participated in discussions aimed at achieving the introduction of a so called NES fee for shipments by air originating in the United Kingdom. The NES fee was to be applied in connection with costs arising through the application of a pre-clearance system introduced by the United Kingdom's customs authorities for shipments leaving the United Kingdom.

2.2.2 Air Automated Manifest System ("AMS") fee from Germany andSwitzerland:

During July 2004 freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel (AG & Co.) KG in Germany and Kuhne + Nagel Aktiengeselischaft in Switzerland . participated in discussions aimed at achieving the introduction of a so called AMS fee for prepaid shipments by air to the US originating in Germany and Switzerland. Discussions also related to the approximate level of the AMS fee. The AMS fee was to be applied in connection with costs arising through the application of a pre-clearance system introduced by the US customs authorities for shipments to the US.

2.2.3 Chinese Air Currency Adjustment Factor ("CAF"):

During the period July 2005 to March 2006, freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel Ltd. (China) in Shangai, China agreed with competitors on the introduction of a currency adjustment factor or CAF for shipments by air originating in China. The CAF was designed to compensate freight forwarders for the losses incurred following a change in the value ratio of the US dollar to the Chinese renmimbi.

2.2.4 Hong Kong air Peak Season Surchage ("PSS"):

During the period August 2005 to May 2007 various freight forwarders including Kuhne + Nagel Ltd. (HongKong) in Hong Kong participated in discussions aimed at exchanging information, such as start and end dates and approximate amounts, regarding the introduction of a peak season surcharge or PSS for shipments by air originating in Hong Kong. The PSS was designed to compensate freight forwarders for the rate increases imposed upon them by the air carriers during busy periods for air cargo shipments.

2.3 In light of its findings, the Commission took a decision to refer its findings of conduct in contravention of section 4{1)(b)(i) to the Tribunal for adjudication.

3. Statement of conduct by K+N SA

K+N SA acknowledges that the conduct described above constitutes a contravention of section 4(1 )(b)(i) of the Act and admits that it benefited from such conduct.

4. Administrative Penalty

In accordance with the provisions of section 58(1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 59(1 )(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, K+N SA is liable for and has agreed to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R962,657.01 (nine hundred and sixty two thousand six hundred and fifty seven Rand and one Cent), which amounts constitutes 5% of the relevant turnover in 2007.

K+N SA will pay the amount set out in paragraph 4.3 above to the Commission within seven days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

This payment shall be made into the Commission's bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name: Absa Bank

Branch name: Pretoria

Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account

Account number: 4050778576

Account type: Current Account

Branch Code: 323 345

4.4 The penalty will.bewill.be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

5. Agreement Concerning Future Conduct

5.1 K+N SA agrees to cooperate with the Commission in relation to theprosecution of the conduct described in this Consent Agreement. Withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, K+N SA specifically agrees to:

Provide witnesses to testify in the complaint referral (if any) in respect of alleged contraventions covered by this Consent Agreement; and

To the extent that it is in existence, and has not already been provided to the Commission, provide evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control, concerning the alleged contraventions contained in this Consent Agreement.

K+N SA agrees that it will refrain from any conduct that may contravene section 4(1 )(b) of the Act.

K+N SA undertakes to develop and implement a compliance programme, with corporate governance, designed to ensure that all its relevant employees are aware of the provisions of the Competition Act and do not contravene them; and to submit a copy of the aforementioned compliance programme outlined above to the Commission within 90 business days of the date of confirmation of this Consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6. Full and Final Settlement

This agreement is entered into in full and final settlement and, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and K+N SA, Kuehne+Nagel Group, Kuehne+Nage! International AG and any other company that forms part of the Kuehne+Nagel group of companies relating to any alleged contravention of the Act that is the subject of the Commission's

investigation under Case No. 2007Oct 3236.

Dated and signed at EDENVALE on the 10th day of FEBRUARY 2012.

FOR KUEHNE + NAGEL (PTY) LIMITED

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.